'High potential' programs: Let's hear it for 'B' players

被引:48
作者
Malik, Amina Raza [1 ]
Singh, Parbudyal [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Fac Liberal Arts & Profess Studies, Sch Human Resource Management, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
High potential programs; Bowen and Ostroff's framework; Perceived organizational justice; 'B' players; Talent management; Trust; HR attributions; Motivation profile; HUMAN-RESOURCE ARCHITECTURE; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE THEORY; TALENT MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; LEARNING ORIENTATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; TRUST; COMMITMENT; HRM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.06.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Organizations implement 'high potential' (HiPo) programs to identify, develop and retain their most talented employees (also known as 'A' players). However, there is still not much known on how these programs affect other employees (i.e., 'B' players) who are not included. Drawing on Bowen and Ostroff's (2004) framework on the strength of HRM system and attribution theory, we theoretically examine the impact of HiPo programs on 'B' players' attitudes and behaviours. Specifically, we propose that 'B' players use various information and contextual cues to make attributions about these programs. We also propose that trust moderates the relationship between various meta-features of HiPo programs and 'B' players' perceptions about these programs. Further, we examine the role of an employee's motivation profile (i.e., achievement motivation and power motivation) in forming his/her attributions about these programs, which then affects his/her commitment and organizational citizenship behaviours. Future research directions and practical implications are presented. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 346
页数:17
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]   The link between perceived HRM practices, performance and well-being: the moderating effect of trust in the employer [J].
Alfes, Kerstin ;
Shantz, Amanda ;
Truss, Catherine .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 22 (04) :409-427
[2]   Public versus Private Managers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Leadership Behavior [J].
Andersen, Jon Aarum .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2010, 70 (01) :131-141
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ANTECEDENTS CONSEQUE
[4]   Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model [J].
Aryee, S ;
Budhwar, PS ;
Chen, ZX .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (03) :267-285
[5]   THE PROACTIVE COMPONENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR - A MEASURE AND CORRELATES [J].
BATEMAN, TS ;
CRANT, JM .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) :103-118
[6]  
Becker B.E., 2009, DIFFERENTIATED WORKF
[7]   The global "war for talent" [J].
Beechler, Schon ;
Woodward, Ian C. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 15 (03) :273-285
[8]  
Bies R.J., 1986, RES NEGOTIATION ORG, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[9]   Talent or Not? Employee Reactions to Talent Identification [J].
Bjorkman, Ingmar ;
Ehrnrooth, Mats ;
Makela, Kristiina ;
Smale, Adam ;
Sumelius, Jennie .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 52 (02) :195-214
[10]  
Blau P., 1964, EXCHANGE POWER SOC, DOI [10.4324/9780203792643, DOI 10.4324/9780203792643]