PECUNIARY COMPENSATION INCREASES PARTICIPATION IN SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER

被引:9
作者
Aas, Eline [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
health screening programme; willingness to pay; compensation; cost; binary probit; MORAL HAZARD; POPULATION; INCENTIVES; ATTENDANCE; COLON;
D O I
10.1002/hec.1371
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The participation rate in medical screening programmes is typically below 100%, which means that not all potential health benefits are fully exploited. In this paper, the prospect of pecuniary compensation is tested as a method of increasing the participation rate. We propose a model explaining the individual's probability of participating ill screening for colorectal cancer when he is offered pecuniary compensation, given that lie did not participate when first invited. The participant's decision is based oil both known and uncertain factors. The estimation is conducted in two steps, where a binary probit model is used in each. We find that pecuniary compensation increases the probability of participation, and that an individual's participation probability systematically varies with variables such as travel expenses, income, age, education level, expected benefit from the screening, use of health-care services, genetic predisposition and subjective health status. Using the results from the estimation, we predict changes in the participation rate For different levels of compensation and estimate the cost per additional individual screened. The cost per additional individual screened is 808, including 25 in compensation; this cost increases with the level of compensation. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 354
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AAS E, 2008, THESIS U OSLO
[2]  
AAS E, 2004, OKONOMISK FORUM, V7, P34
[3]   Health care incentives in immunisation [J].
Achat, H ;
McIntyre, P ;
Burgess, M .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 23 (03) :285-288
[4]   Improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Whynes, DK .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (07) :513-514
[5]  
BENAKIVA L, 1985, MIT PRESS SERIES TRA, V9
[6]   The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France [J].
Berchi C. ;
Dupuis J.-M. ;
Launoy G. .
The European Journal of Health Economics, 2006, 7 (2) :91-98
[7]  
BRETTHAUER M, 2002, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V5, P569
[8]   A COMPARISON OF PRENATAL-CARE USE IN THE UNITED-STATES AND EUROPE [J].
BUEKENS, P ;
KOTELCHUCK, M ;
BLONDEL, B ;
KRISTENSEN, FB ;
CHEN, JH ;
MASUYSTROOBANT, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :31-36
[9]   Screening and preventable illness [J].
Byrne, MM ;
Thompson, P .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (06) :1077-1088
[10]   Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP ;
Byrne, D ;
Guy, JR ;
Morcom, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (04) :147-152