Considerations, possible contraindications, and potential mechanisms for deleterious effect in recreational and athletic use of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) in lieu of anabolic androgenic steroids: A narrative review

被引:26
|
作者
Machek, Steven B. [1 ]
Cardaci, Thomas D. [1 ,2 ]
Wilburn, Dylan T. [1 ]
Willoughby, Darryn S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Robbins Coll Hlth & Human Sci, Dept Hlth Human Performance & Recreat, Exercise & Biochem Nutr Lab, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Exercise Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ Mary Hardin Baylor, Mayborn Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Exercise & Sport Sci, Belton, TX 76513 USA
关键词
Selective androgen receptor modulator; Anabolic androgenic steroids; Drug testing; Skeletal muscle; Selective estrogen receptor modulator; Hypogonadism; LEVATOR ANI MUSCLE; PREVENTS BONE LOSS; TESTOSTERONE REPLACEMENT; HETERODIMER FORMATION; ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS; ENOBOSARM GTX-024; CARDIAC DEATH; SUDDEN-DEATH; WOMEN; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.steroids.2020.108753
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are testosterone and testosterone-derivative compounds sporadically employed by athletes and increasingly used recreationally to acquire a competitive edge or improve body composition. Nevertheless, users are subject to undesired side effects majorly associated with tissue-specific androgen receptor (AR) binding-mediated actions. More recently, selective AR modulators (SARMs) have gained popularity towards delivering androgen-associated anabolic actions with hopes of minimal androgenic effects. While several SARMs are in preclinical and clinical phases intended for demographics subject to hypo-gonadism, muscle wasting, and osteoporosis, several athletic organizations and drug testing affiliates have realized the increasingly widespread use of SARMs amongst competitors and have subsequently banned their use. Furthermore, recreational users are haphazardly acquiring these compounds from the internet and consuming doses several times greater than empirically reported. Unfortunately, online sources are rife with potential contamination, despite a prevailing public opinion suggesting SARMs are innocuous AAS alternatives. Considering each agent has a broad range of supporting evidence in both human and non-human models, it is important to comprehensively evaluate the current literature on commercially available SARMs to gain better understanding of their efficacy and if they can truly be considered a safer AAS alternative. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to discuss the current evidence regarding AAS and SARM mechanisms of action, demonstrate the efficacy of several prominent SARMs in a variety of scientific trials, and theorize on the wide-ranging contraindications and potential deleterious effects, as well as potential future directions regarding acute and chronic SARM use across a broad range of demographics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据