The party choice set and satisfaction with democracy

被引:27
作者
Dassonneville, Ruth [1 ]
McAllister, Ian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Polit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Polit & Int Relat, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Party systems; elections; political choices; voting; political parties; electoral systems; CROSS-NATIONAL ANALYSIS; POLITICAL-INSTITUTIONS; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; CITIZEN SATISFACTION; ELECTORAL SYSTEMS; GOVERNMENT; QUALITY; SUPPORT; CORRUPTION; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2019.1609286
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A well-functioning democracy requires citizens' support for its political institutions and procedures. While scholars have previously studied the role of contextual factors for explaining satisfaction with democracy, a rigorous focus on how the party choice set affects how satisfied citizens are with democracy is largely absent from the literature. This neglect of the impact of parties is surprising, given their central position within modern, representative democracies. In this article, a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the impact of party systems on citizens' satisfaction with democracy is presented. Use is made of the combined data of the first four modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems project and various measures of the party system are used to capture different aspects of the party choice set: the number of parties, their polarisation, and the congruence between public opinion and the party offer. In contrast to expectations, only scant evidence is found that having a wider choice increases citizens' satisfaction with democracy.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 73
页数:25
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Satisfaction with democracy: Do institutions matter? [J].
Aarts, Kees ;
Thomassen, Jacques .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2008, 27 (01) :5-18
[2]   GENERATIONAL REPLACEMENT AND VALUE CHANGE IN 8 WEST EUROPEAN SOCIETIES [J].
ABRAMSON, PR ;
INGLEHART, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1992, 22 :183-228
[3]   Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Guillory, CA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (01) :66-81
[4]   Parties, party systems, and satisfaction with democratic performance in the new Europe [J].
Anderson, CJ .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1998, 46 (03) :572-588
[5]   Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Tverdova, YV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 47 (01) :91-109
[6]  
Andeweg R., 2017, MYTH REALITY LEGITIM, P76
[7]  
Andeweg R.B., 2017, Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies
[8]  
André A, 2017, POLIT BEHAV, V39, P377, DOI 10.1007/s11109-016-9360-x
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, POLITICAL DISAFFECTI
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Comparative Politics