An analysis of air mass effects on rail ridership in three US cities

被引:47
作者
Kalkstein, Adam J. [1 ]
Kuby, Michael [1 ]
Gerrity, Daniel [2 ]
Clancy, James J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Rail transit; Air mass; Urban transportation; Weather; Climate; Ridership; WEATHER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.07.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines whether daily weather affects ridership in urban transportation systems. When examining human-weather relationships, it is often advantageous to examine air masses, which take into account the entire parcel of air over a region. Spatial synoptic classification characterizes air masses based upon numerous meteorological variables at a given location. Thus, rather than examining temperature or precipitation individually, here we compare daily ridership to synoptic air mass classifications for three urban rail systems: Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), and the Hudson-Bergen light-rail line in northern New Jersey. Air masses are found to have a significant impact on daily rail ridership, with usage typically increasing on dry, comfortable days and decreasing on moist, cool ones, particularly on weekends. Although the comfort of a particular air mass changes throughout the year, seasonality is not a significant factor with respect to the air mass-ridership relationship. The results of this study can benefit rail system managers who must predict daily ridership or in the development of cost-benefit analyses for station improvements. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AAHEIM HA, 2005, 200507 CTR INT CLIM
[2]   Weather as a chronic hazard for road transportation in Canadian cities [J].
Andrey, J ;
Mills, B ;
Leahy, M ;
Suggett, J .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2003, 28 (2-3) :319-343
[3]  
ARLINGHAUS SL, 1985, CLIMATIC EFFECTS BUS
[4]  
CERVERO R., 1993, RIDERSHIP IMPACTS TR
[5]   Effects of summer precipitation on urban transportation [J].
Changnon, SA .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1996, 32 (04) :481-494
[6]   Understanding individual travel decisions: results from a commuters survey in Geneva [J].
De Palma, A ;
Rochat, D .
TRANSPORTATION, 1999, 26 (03) :263-281
[7]  
DEMERY LW, 2002, URBAN TRANSIT DISINF
[8]  
Fielding GJ, 1995, GEOGRAPHY URBAN TRAN, P287
[9]   Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: what difference do they make? [J].
Filion, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2001, 33 (01) :141-160
[10]   How (in) accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation [J].
Flyvbjerg, B ;
Holm, MKS ;
Buhl, SL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2005, 71 (02) :131-146