Distributed Formation Control via Mixed Barycentric Coordinate and Distance-Based Approach

被引:9
作者
Fathian, Kaveh [1 ]
Rachinskii, Dmitrii, I [2 ]
Spong, Mark W. [3 ]
Summers, Tyler H. [4 ]
Gans, Nicholas R. [5 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Math Sci, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Syst Engn, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[4] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Mech Engn, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[5] Univ Texas Arlington, UT Arlington Res Inst, Arlington, TX 76118 USA
来源
2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC) | 2019年
关键词
Multi-agent systems; distributed formation control; agent-based systems; RIGID FORMATIONS; GLOBAL STABILIZATION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.23919/acc.2019.8814890
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We present a distributed control strategy for a team of agents to autonomously achieve a desired planar formation. Our control strategy is based on combining the barycentric coordinate-based (BCB) and the distance-based (DB) approach. In the BCB approach, the almost global convergence of the agents to the desired formation shape is guaranteed, however, the formation scale cannot be controlled. In the DB method, the scale of the achieved formation is controlled, however, the convergence is local and in general stable undesired equilibria exist. By combining these methods via imposing a timescale separation between their respective dynamics, our proposed control strategy retains the advantages of each approach and avoids their shortcomings. We analyze the stability properties of the proposed control and prove that the desired formation is an almost globally stable equilibrium. We provide simulations to typify the theoretical results and compare our method with a leader-follower BCB (LF-BCB) approach that can be used to control the formation scale in the BCB strategy. In particular, we demonstrate that unlike the LF-BCB approach, our method is far more robust to measurement inaccuracies.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Anderson BDO, 2008, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V28, P48, DOI 10.1109/MCS.2008.929280
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Matrix Analysis
[3]   Coordinate-free formation stabilization based on relative position measurements [J].
Aranda, Miguel ;
Lopez-Nicolas, Gonzalo ;
Saguees, Carlos ;
Zavlanos, Michael M. .
AUTOMATICA, 2015, 57 :11-20
[4]   Distributed control of triangular formations with angle-only constraints [J].
Basiri, Meysam ;
Bishop, Adrian N. ;
Jensfelt, Patric .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 2010, 59 (02) :147-154
[5]   On Global Stability of Planar Formations [J].
Belabbas, Mohamed Ali .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (08) :2148-2153
[6]  
Bishop A. N., 2014, INT J ROBUST NONLINE
[7]  
Bishop AN, 2013, IEEE INTL CONF CONTR, P1194, DOI 10.1109/CCA.2013.6662914
[8]  
Carrillo H, 2015, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P487, DOI 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139224
[9]   Distributed algorithm for controlling scale-free polygonal formations. [J].
de Marina, Hector Garcia ;
Jayawardhana, Bayu ;
Cao, Ming .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01) :1760-1765
[10]  
Deghat M, 2015, 2015 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), P2342, DOI 10.1109/ECC.2015.7330888