Overcompensation: a 30-year perspective

被引:43
作者
Ramula, Satu [1 ]
Paige, Ken N. [2 ]
Lennartsson, Tommy [3 ]
Tuomi, Juha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Biol, Turku 20014, Finland
[2] Univ Illinois, Sch Integrat Biol, 505 South Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Swedish Biodivers Ctr, Box 7016, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
herbivory; overcompensation; overcompensation 30 years later; plant defense; plant-herbivore interactions; resistance; tolerance; PLANT TOLERANCE; APICAL DOMINANCE; MAMMALIAN HERBIVORY; BUD DORMANCY; EVOLUTION; DEFENSE; RESISTANCE; PLASTICITY; STRATEGIES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1002/ecy.2667
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biomass removal by herbivores usually incurs a fitness cost for the attacked plants, with the total cost per unit lost tissue depending on the value of the removed tissue (i.e., how costly it is to be replaced by regrowth). Optimal defense theory, first outlined in the 1960s and 1970s, predicted that these fitness costs result in an arms race between plants and herbivores, in which selection favors resistance strategies that either repel herbivores through morphological and chemical resistance traits in order to reduce their consumption, or result in enemy escape through rapid growth or by timing the growth or flowering to the periods when herbivores are absent. Such resistance against herbivores would most likely evolve when herbivores are abundant, cause extensive damage, and consume valuable plant tissues. The purpose of this Special Feature is to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the phenomenon of overcompensation, specifically, where the finding has brought us and where it is leading us 30 yr later. We first provide a short overview of how the phenomenon of overcompensation has led to broader studies on plant tolerance to herbivory, summarize key findings, and then discuss some promising new directions in light of six featured research papers.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   Molecular constraints on resistance-tolerance trade-offs [J].
Mesa, J. Miles ;
Scholes, Daniel R. ;
Juvik, John A. ;
Paige, Ken N. .
ECOLOGY, 2017, 98 (10) :2528-2537
[42]   Bud dormancy as a bet-hedging strategy [J].
Nilsson, P ;
Tuomi, J ;
Astrom, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 147 (02) :269-281
[44]   OVERCOMPENSATION IN RESPONSE TO MAMMALIAN HERBIVORY - THE ADVANTAGE OF BEING EATEN [J].
PAIGE, KN ;
WHITHAM, TG .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1987, 129 (03) :407-416
[46]   Macroevolutionary constraints to tolerance: trade-offs with drought tolerance and phenology, but not resistance [J].
Pearse, Ian S. ;
Aguilar, Jessica ;
Schroder, John ;
Strauss, Sharon Y. .
ECOLOGY, 2017, 98 (11) :2758-2772
[47]   Can overcompensation increase crop production? [J].
Poveda, Katja ;
Diaz, Maria F. ;
Ramirez, Augusto .
ECOLOGY, 2018, 99 (02) :270-280
[48]   Overcompensation and adaptive plasticity of apical dominance in Erysimum strictum (Brassicaceae) in response to simulated browsing and resource availability [J].
Rautio, P ;
Huhta, AP ;
Piippo, S ;
Tuomi, J ;
Juenger, T ;
Saari, M ;
Aspi, J .
OIKOS, 2005, 111 (01) :179-191
[49]   TERRESTRIAL PLANT TOLERANCE TO HERBIVORY [J].
ROSENTHAL, JP ;
KOTANEN, PM .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (04) :145-148
[50]   Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana regrowth patterns suggests a trade-off between undamaged fitness and damage tolerance [J].
Scholes, Daniel R. ;
Rasnick, Erika N. ;
Paige, Ken N. .
OECOLOGIA, 2017, 184 (03) :643-652