The nature of UK supermarkets' policies on checkout food and associations with healthfulness and type of food displayed: cross-sectional study

被引:24
作者
Ejlerskov, Katrine T. [1 ]
Stead, Martine [2 ]
Adamson, Ashley [3 ,4 ]
White, Martin [1 ]
Adams, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Ctr Diet & Act Res, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Stirling, Fac Hlth Sci & Sport, Inst Social Mkt, Stirling, Scotland
[3] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Newcastle Univ, Human Nutr Res Ctr, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Checkout; Supermarket; Nutrition; Obesogenic environment; Marketing; Snack food; Policy; Unhealthy; Public health; PRODUCTS; SNACKS; STORES; SALES; CANDY;
D O I
10.1186/s12966-018-0684-2
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Food choices are often determined by stimuli from our immediate surroundings, including strategic placement in shops to encourage impulse purchases. One example of this is food in shop checkout areas. Recently a number of UK supermarkets have voluntarily committed to providing healthier checkout foods. The aim of this study was to document the nature of current UK supermarket checkout food policies; determine whether there are any differences in the healthfulness and type of food displayed at checkouts in supermarkets according to the presence or nature of policies; and determine whether supermarkets are adhering to their checkout food policies. Methods: Survey of checkout food policies. Cross-sectional observations in 69 supermarkets (covering 14 store formats) in the East of England in Feb-May 2017 of the number and type of checkout foods on each 'checkout journey' (each possible route through the checkout area). Checkout foods were categorised as less healthy or healthier, using the UK Food Standard's Agency's Nutrient Profile Model, and into food groups. Checkout food policies were categorised as clear and consistent, vague or inconsistent, or absent. Results: Checkout food policies differed between store formats in some supermarket groups. Across the 14 store formats included, two had no checkout food policy, six had 'clear and consistent' policies, and six 'vague or inconsistent' policies. In supermarkets with clear and consistent policies there were a median of 13 products per checkout journey, of which 35% were less healthy. Comparable figures for supermarkets with vague or inconsistent, and absent policies were 15 (57%) and 39 (90%) respectively (ps for trend < 0.001). Whilst most supermarkets with a clear and consistent checkout food policy were fully adherent to their policy, those with vague or inconsistent policies were not. Conclusions: Most UK supermarkets have checkout food policies, but not all are clear and consistent. Supermarkets with clear and consistent policies display fewer checkout foods and a lower proportion of these are less healthy than in other supermarkets. Supermarkets with clear and consistent policies adhere well to these. More stores should be encouraged to develop a clear and consistent checkout food policy. This may require non- voluntary intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consumer knowledge and use of food and nutrition labelling in South Africa: A cross-sectional descriptive study
    Koen, Nelene
    Wentzel-Viljoen, Edelweiss
    Nel, Daan
    Blaauw, Renee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2018, 42 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [32] Exploring the Impact of Crises on Food Security in Lebanon: Results from a National Cross-Sectional Study
    Hoteit, Maha
    Al-Atat, Youssef
    Joumaa, Hussein
    El Ghali, Suheir
    Mansour, Rania
    Mhanna, Reem
    Sayyed-Ahmad, Fatima
    Salameh, Pascale
    Al-Jawaldeh, Ayoub
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (16)
  • [33] A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Childhood Educators' Childhood and Current Food Insecurity and Dietary Intake
    Swindle, Taren M.
    Ward, Wendy L.
    Bokony, Patti
    Whiteside-Mansell, Leanne
    JOURNAL OF HUNGER & ENVIRONMENTAL NUTRITION, 2018, 13 (01) : 40 - 54
  • [34] Environmental footprints of food consumption and dietary patterns among Lebanese adults: a cross-sectional study
    Naja, Farah
    Jomaa, Lamis
    Itani, Leila
    Zidek, Jeremy
    El Labban, Sibelle
    Sibai, Abla Mehio
    Hwalla, Nahla
    NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2018, 17
  • [35] Effect of ultraprocessed food intake on cardiometabolic risk is mediated by diet quality: a cross-sectional study
    Griffin, Jennifer
    Albaloul, Anwar
    Kopytek, Alexandra
    Elliott, Paul
    Frost, Gary
    BMJ NUTRITION, PREVENTION & HEALTH, 2021, 4 (01) : 174 - 180
  • [36] Health literacy and eating disorder pathology in women with food insecurity: A preliminary cross-sectional study
    Kells, Meredith R.
    Davis, Heather A.
    Todorov, Sophia
    Wildes, Jennifer E.
    EATING BEHAVIORS, 2023, 49
  • [37] A cross-sectional study of the association between food literacy and dietary intake among Danish adolescents
    Mullertz, Alberte Laura Oest
    Stjernqvist, Nanna Wurr
    Outzen, Malene Hoj
    Bloch, Paul
    Elsborg, Peter
    Ravn-Haren, Gitte
    APPETITE, 2024, 200
  • [38] Public acceptability of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: repeat cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study (2017-2019)
    Adams, Jean
    Pell, David
    Penney, Tarra L.
    Hammond, David
    Vanderlee, Lana
    White, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [39] Elderly's food security and its associated socioeconomic determinants in Tehran: A cross-sectional study
    Alipour, Vahid
    Rezapour, Aziz
    Shali, Mahboobeh
    Harati Khalilabad, Touraj
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [40] Obesogenicity perception of food environments in adults: A cross-sectional study in urban areas of Santiago, Chile
    Osiac, Lorena Rodriguez
    Rojas, Daniel Egana
    Carrasco, Paulina Molina
    Rios, Rodrigo Villegas
    Villalobos, Barbara Castillo
    Espinoza, Patricia Galvez
    MEDWAVE, 2024, 24 (09):