Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations

被引：5

作者：

Bornmann, Lutz ^{[1
]}

Glanzel, Wolfgang ^{[2
,3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies, Adm Headquarters, Hofgartenstr 8, D-80539 Munich, Germany

[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ECOOM, Naamsestr 61, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium

[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept MSI, Naamsestr 61, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium

[4] Lib Hungarian Acad Sci, Dept Sci Policy & Scientometr, Arany Janos U 1, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary

来源：

SCIENTOMETRICS | 2018年 / 115卷 / 02期

关键词：

Leiden Ranking; Field-normalized indicator; Score differences; Characteristics scores and scales; CSS;

D O I：

10.1007/s11192-018-2700-3

中图分类号：

TP39 [计算机的应用];

学科分类号：

081203 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

The comparison of two universities in terms of bibliometric indicators frequently faces the problem of assessing the differences as meaningful or not. This Letter to the Editor proposes some benchmarks which can be used for supporting the interpretation of institutional differences.

引用

页码：1101 / 1105

页数：5

共 4 条

[1] Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? [J].

Bornmann, Lutz ;

Haunschild, Robin .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 110 (02) :937-943

[2] Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 [J].

Bornmann, Lutz ;

Mutz, Ruediger ;

Daniel, Hans-Dieter .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (08) :1649-1658

[3] CHARACTERISTIC SCORES AND SCALES IN ASSESSING CITATION IMPACT [J].

GLANZEL, W ;

SCHUBERT, A .

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1988, 14 (02) :123-127

[4]

Glanzel W., 2016, CITATION CLASSES NOV

← 1 →