Isolation, identification and characterization of lytic, wide host range bacteriophages from waste effluents against Salmonella enterica serovars

被引:51
作者
Akhtar, Mastura [1 ]
Viazis, Stelios [1 ]
Diez-Gonzalez, Francisco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Food Sci & Nutr, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Phages; Salmonella; Antimicrobial; Anti-Salmonella phages; Biocontrol; Food safety; VIRULENT; PHAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.064
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The use of bacteriophages is considered as a viable alternative to chemical antimicrobials against foodborne pathogens. The objective of this study was to develop a collection of lytic bacteriophages which will be able to infect different pathogenic Salmonella enterica serovars. Phages were isolated from animal feces and sewage samples, purified, characterized morphologically and by DNA fingerprinting, and host ranges were determined. Spot test and efficiency of plaguing (EOP) data indicated that two phages, SEA1 and SEA2 had the broadest host range against Salmonella among all isolated phages. SEA2 was highly efficient to infect S. Typhimurium DT104 (0.5-1 EOP value). Only phage SSA1 was able to infect S. Montevideo. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the phages in the collection were mostly (4 out of 6) Siphoviridae, while SEA1 and SEA2 were Myoviridae T4-like phages. SEA1 and SEA2 had the largest genome sizes in the collection, 190 and 170 kb, respectively. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis demonstrated distinct digestion profiles with EcoRI for phages SSA1, STD3, STE3 and STF1. However, SEA1 and SEA2 shared a similar restriction enzyme (RE) digestion pattern with same morphotype, but distinct profiles in lysing Salmonella strains. These anti-Salmonella phages were highly host specific with few exceptions of lytic phases that were able to infect a wide variety of Salmonella. These phages have potential for use in applications controlling Salmonella on different matrices. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ackermann Hans-W., 2009, V501, P127, DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_13
[2]   Salmonella host range of bactedophages that infect muftiple genera [J].
Bielke, L. ;
Higgins, S. ;
Donoghue, A. ;
Donoghue, D. ;
Hargis, B. M. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 (12) :2536-2540
[3]   Common themes among bacteriophage-encoded virulence factors and diversity among the bacteriophages involved [J].
Boyd, EF ;
Brüssow, H .
TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 10 (11) :521-529
[4]  
Calendar R., 2005, Phages, their role in bacterial pathogenesis and biotechnology, P18
[5]   Occurrence of Salmonella-Specific Bacteriophages in Swine Feces Collected from Commercial Farms [J].
Callaway, Todd R. ;
Edrington, Tom S. ;
Brabban, Andrew ;
Kutter, Elizabeth ;
Karriker, Locke ;
Stahl, Chad ;
Wagstrom, Elizabeth ;
Anderson, Robin C. ;
Genovese, Ken ;
McReynolds, Jack ;
Harvey, Roger ;
Nisbet, David J. .
FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2010, 7 (07) :851-856
[6]   Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting Salmonella spp. [J].
Carey-Smith, GV ;
Billington, C ;
Cornelius, AJ ;
Hudson, JA ;
Heinemann, JA .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 258 (02) :182-186
[7]   Bacteriophage P100 for control of Listeria monocytogenes in foods:: Genome sequence, bioinformatic analyses, oral toxicity study, and application [J].
Carlton, RM ;
Noordman, WH ;
Biswas, B ;
de Meester, ED ;
Loessner, MJ .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 43 (03) :301-312
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2001, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V50, P701
[9]   Comparative genomics reveals close genetic relationships between phages from dairy bacteria and pathogenic streptococci:: Evolutionary implications for prophage-host interactions [J].
Desiere, F ;
McShan, WM ;
van Sinderen, D ;
Ferretti, JJ ;
Brüssow, H .
VIROLOGY, 2001, 288 (02) :325-341
[10]   STUDIES ON BACTERIOPHAGE DISTRIBUTION - VIRULENT AND TEMPERATE BACTERIOPHAGE CONTENT OF MAMMALIAN FECES [J].
DHILLON, TS ;
DHILLON, EKS ;
CHAU, HC ;
LI, WK ;
TSANG, AHC .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1976, 32 (01) :68-74