Pregnant women's navigation of information on everyday household chemicals: phthalates as a case study

被引:18
作者
Ashley, Justin M. [1 ]
Hodgson, Alexandra [1 ]
Sharma, Sapna [1 ]
Nisker, Jeff [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Childrens Hlth Res Inst, London, ON, Canada
[3] Victoria Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Pregnant women; Household chemicals; Phthalates; Navigating risk; HUMAN EXPOSURE; HEALTH; RISK; ASSOCIATION; TRANSLATION; MOTHERHOOD; PLASTICS; IMPACT; DUST;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-015-0748-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Current developments in science and the media have now placed pregnant women in a precarious situation as they are charged with the responsibility to navigate through information sources to make the best decisions for her pregnancy. Yet little is known regarding how pregnant women want to receive and use health information in general, let alone information regarding the uncertain risks to pregnancy in everyday household products such as phthalates found in cosmetics and canned food liners. Using phthalates as an example, this study investigated how pregnant women obtain, evaluate, and act on information regarding their pregnancy. Methods: Pregnant women were recruited using pamphlets and posters distributed in prenatal clinics, prenatal fairs and physician offices in Southwestern Ontario Canada. Research participants were engaged in 20 to 40 min semi-structured interviews regarding their use of information sources in pregnancy, particularly regarding phthalates in cosmetics and canned food liners. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using constructivist grounded theory techniques supported by NVivo 9 T software. Results: Theoretical sufficiency was reached after 23 pregnant women were interviewed and their transcripts analyzed. Three overlapping themes resulted from the co-constructed analysis: I-Strength of Information Sources; IIValue Modifiers; and III-Deciding to Control Exposure. The research participants reported receiving information from a wide range of sources that they perceived varying in strength or believability. They then described the strategies employed to increase the validity of the message in order to avoid risk exposure. Pregnant women preferred a strong source of information such as physician, government but frequently used weak sources such as the internet or the opinions of friends. A model was developed from the relationship between themes that describes how pregnant women navigate the multiple sources of information available to them. Conclusion: Our study provides insight into how pregnant women receive, appraise, and act on information regarding everyday household chemicals. Clinicians and their professional organizations should produce specific educational materials to assist women in understanding exposure to everyday products in pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Exposure to toxic environmental agents [J].
不详 .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (04) :931-934
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory
[3]  
Bellingham M, 2013, 37 RCOG
[4]  
Blum D, 2014, NY TIMES
[5]   The association between asthma and allergic symptoms in children and phthalates in house dust:: A nested case-control study [J].
Bornehag, CG ;
Sundell, J ;
Weschler, CJ ;
Sigsgaard, T ;
Lundgren, B ;
Hasselgren, M ;
Hägerhed-Engman, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (14) :1393-1397
[6]   A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks [J].
Briggs, David J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2008, 7 (1)
[7]   Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care [J].
Bryers, Helen MacKenzie ;
van Teijlingen, Edwin .
MIDWIFERY, 2010, 26 (05) :488-496
[8]   The Art and Science of Teratogen Risk Communication [J].
Conover, Elizabeth A. ;
Polifka, Janine E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2011, 157C (03) :227-233
[9]  
Dey I., 1999, Grounding grounded theory. guidelines for qualitative inquiry
[10]   Do we have a knowledge transfer and translation plan at Teratogen Information Services? [J].
Einarson, Adrienne ;
Lockett, Donna .
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 22 (03) :542-545