Five year clinical outcomes of metal ceramic and zirconia-based implant-supported dental prostheses: A retrospective study

被引:10
作者
Nejatidanesh, Farahnaz [1 ]
Abbasi, Mahsa [2 ]
Savabi, Ghazal [1 ]
Bonakdarchian, Morteza [3 ]
Atash, Ramin [4 ]
Savabi, Omid [3 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dent Mat Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Shahrekord Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Shahrekord, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dent Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst, Esfahan, Iran
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasmus Hosp, Dept Stomatol & Dent, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Dental prostheses; Dental restoration failures; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Survival analysis; Treatment outcomes; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES; LEAST; 5; YEARS; COMPLICATION RATES; OBSERVATION PERIOD; PART I; SURVIVAL; TOOTH; RESTORATIONS; RETENTION; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103420
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The implant-supported restorations can be made of all-ceramic materials. The purpose of this study was to compare five year clinical outcomes of zirconia-based and metal ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Methods: In this study, 114 posterior implant-supported FDPs including zirconia-based (52) or metal ceramic (62) restorations were made for 114 patients with a mean age of 59 +/- 8.4 years and evaluated in a 5 year follow up. The modified California Dental Association (CDA) guidelines were used to assess the quality of the restorations. The soft tissue status was evaluated using gingival and plaque indices, probing depth and bleeding on probing. Additionally, the bone loss around implants was assessed by parallel priapical radiographs. The visual analogue scale was used regarding patients' satisfaction. The data analysis were performed by Kaplan-Meier, log rank test, Cox regression, Mann-Whitney U and Student's t-test. (alpha = 0.05). Results: Five year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the zirconia-based and metal ceramic FDPs were 98.1 % and 100 0 /0 respectively with no significant difference (P = 0.12). The success rates were 81.6 % for zirconia-based and 81.0 % for metal ceramic restorations (P = 0.85). The CDA rating of both studied groups was not significantly different except the marginal gap which was better in zirconia-based FDPs (P < 0.001). Fracture of veneering ceramics occurred in 2.7 % of metal ceramic and 6.4 % of zirconia-based FDPs, which were not considered as failure. Soft tissue status was not affected by the type of restorations except for plaque index which was more favorable for zirconia-based FDPs (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between marginal bone loss of the two groups (P = 0.30 mesial, P = 0.46 distal). Conclusions: Zirconia-based and metal ceramic FDPs showed similar promising clinical performance in the 5-year follow-up. Clinical significance: Zirconia-based implant-supported FDPs might be a successful restorative method with acceptable survival rate and patient's satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Practice-Based Evidence from 29-Year Outcome Analysis of Management of the Edentulous Jaw Using Osseointegrated Dental Implants [J].
Dhima, Matilda ;
Paulusova, Vladimira ;
Lohse, Christine ;
Salinas, Thomas J. ;
Carr, Alan B. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (03) :173-181
[2]   Randomized Clinical Trial of Implant-Supported Ceramic-Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses: Preliminary Results [J].
Esquivel-Upshaw, Josephine F. ;
Clark, Arthur E. ;
Shuster, Jonathan J. ;
Anusavice, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (02) :73-82
[3]   Zirconia in Fixed Implant Prosthodontics [J].
Guess, Petra Christine ;
Att, Wael ;
Strub, Joerg Rudolf .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (05) :633-645
[4]   A retrospective evaluation of zirconia-fixed partial dentures in general practices: An up to 13-year study [J].
Haff, Anna ;
Lof, Hanna ;
Gunne, Johan ;
Sjogren, Goran .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2015, 31 (02) :162-170
[5]  
Heintze SD, 2010, INT J PROSTHODONT, V23, P493
[6]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss [J].
Kern, Jaana-Sophia ;
Kern, Thomas ;
Wolfart, Stefan ;
Heussen, Nicole .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (02) :174-195
[7]   Prospective evaluation of zirconia based tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: 3-Year results [J].
Konstantinidis, Ioannis K. ;
Jacoby, Stephan ;
Raedel, Michael ;
Boening, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (01) :87-93
[8]   Long-Term Evaluation of ANKYLOS® Dental Implants, Part I: 20-Year Life Table Analysis of a Longitudinal Study of More Than 12,500 Implants [J].
Krebs, Mischa ;
Schmenger, Kai ;
Neumann, Konrad ;
Weigl, Paul ;
Moser, Walter ;
Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 :E275-E286
[9]   Systematic review of short- (5-10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants [J].
Kwon, TaeHyun ;
Bain, Paul A. ;
Levin, Liran .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2014, 42 (10) :1228-1241
[10]   Implant-supported full-arch zirconia-based mandibular fixed dental prostheses. Eight-year results from a clinical pilot study [J].
Larsson, Christel ;
Von Steyern, Per Vult .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (05) :1118-1122