Land tenure, soil conservation, and farm performance: An eco-efficiency analysis of Austrian crop farms

被引:36
作者
Eder, Andreas [1 ]
Salhofer, Klaus [1 ]
Scheichel, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Inst Sustainable Econ Dev, Feistmantelstr 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Soil erosion; Land rental and ownership; Technical efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; WATER EROSION; SUGAR-BEET; EUROPE; PRODUCTIVITY; AGRICULTURE; SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY; ECONOMICS; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106861
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We measure the eco-efficiency (EE) of agricultural production in regard to soil erosion and decompose it into technical efficiency (TE) and soil conservation efficiency (SCE). Data Envelopment Analysis is applied to a panel of 135 Austrian crop farms. As a proxy for soil conservation behavior, we estimate Cand P-factors, frequently applied in Revised Universal Soil Loss Equations, at the parcel-level and combine this with farm-level accountancy data. We investigate the impact of land tenure and other determinants on EE and its components using truncated regression and bootstrapping techniques. Results reveal that: i) the average EE, SCE, and TE is 0.16, 0.26, and 0.54, respectively, suggesting a substantial improvement potential in the soil conservation behavior of farms; ii) tenants have, on average, a significantly higher TE than landowners, but a significantly lower SCE; iii) the effect of tenancy on EE is significantly negative. Results point towards tenants maximizing short term economic benefits leading to the overexploitation of soils. Results ask for regulations that increase the duration and security of rental contracts, and a shift in agricultural subsidies from direct payments based on area to compensations that provide public goods and internalize externalities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Ecological economics of soil erosion: a review of the current state of knowledge
    Adhikari, Bhim
    Nadella, Karthik
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS REVIEWS, 2011, 1219 : 134 - 152
  • [2] CONTRACT CHOICE IN MODERN AGRICULTURE - CASH RENT VERSUS CROPSHARE
    ALLEN, D
    LUECK, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1992, 35 (02) : 397 - 426
  • [3] AMA (AgrarMarkt Austria), 2020, MERKBL OST PROGR FOR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, ECOEFFICIENCY
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, REP POL DEC MAK REAP
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2001, COM(2001) 264 final.
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2001, EC CONS AGR
  • [8] Badunenko O., 2018, FAU Discussion Papers in Economics
  • [9] The crop productivity-erosion relationship: an analysis based on experimental work
    Bakker, MM
    Govers, G
    Rounsevell, MDA
    [J]. CATENA, 2004, 57 (01) : 55 - 76
  • [10] On the evaluation of soil erosion models: Are we doing enough?
    Batista, Pedro V. G.
    Davies, Jessica
    Silva, Marx L. N.
    Quinton, John N.
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2019, 197