In vivo bone tissue response to a canasite glass-ceramic

被引:28
作者
Barros, VMD
Salata, LA
Sverzut, CE
Xavier, SP
van Noort, R
Johnson, A
Hatton, PV [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Clin Dent, Ctr Biomat & Tissue Engn, Sheffield S10 2TA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Oral Surg, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
canasite glass ceramic; bone-implant interface; osteoconductivity; biocompatibility;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00417-3
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the biocompatibility and osteoconductive potential of a high-strength canasite glass ceramic. Glass-ceramic rods were produced using the lost-wax casting technique and implanted in the mid-shafts rabbit femurs. Implants were harvested at 4, 13 and 22 weeks and prepared for light and electron microscopy. Hydroxyapatite was used as a control material. Hydroxyapatite implants were surrounded by new mineralised bone tissue after 4 weeks of implantation. The amount of bone surrounding the implant increased slightly at 13 weeks. In contrast, canasite glass and glass ceramic implants were almost entirely surrounded by soft tissue during all the time periods. Close contact between bone and canasite glass-ceramic implant without the intervening fibrous tissue was observed in only a few regions. The canasite formulation evaluated was not osteoconductive and appeared to degrade in the biological environment. It was therefore concluded that the canasite formulation used was unsuitable for use as implant. Further work is required to improve the biocompatibility of these materials with bone tissue. It is possible that this could be achieved by reducing the solubility of the glass and glass ceramic. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2895 / 2900
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   CHAIN SILICATE GLASS-CERAMICS [J].
BEALL, GH .
JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, 1991, 129 (1-3) :163-173
[2]   DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF GLASS-CERAMICS [J].
BEALL, GH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1992, 22 :91-119
[3]  
BONFIELD W, 1987, BIOMATERIALS CLIN AP
[4]   INFLUENCE OF SURFACE CHEMISTRY ON IMPLANT INTERFACE HISTOLOGY - THEORETICAL BASIS FOR IMPLANT MATERIALS SELECTION [J].
CLARK, AE ;
HENCH, LL ;
PASCHALL, HA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1976, 10 (02) :161-174
[5]  
DACULSI G, 1990, SCANNING MICROSCOPY, V4, P309
[6]   THE INTERFACE OF VARIOUS GLASSES AND GLASS-CERAMICS WITH A BONY IMPLANTATION BED [J].
GROSS, U ;
STRUNZ, V .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1985, 19 (03) :251-271
[7]   DIRECT CHEMICAL BOND OF BIOACTIVE GLASS-CERAMIC MATERIALS TO BONE AND MUSCLE [J].
HENCH, LL ;
PASCHALL, HA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1973, 7 (03) :25-42
[8]  
HENCH LL, 1990, 7 CIMTEC WORLD CER C
[9]  
HENCH LL, 1986, BIOCERAMIC MAT CHARA, V523
[10]   The effect of casting conditions on the biaxial flexural strength of glass-ceramic materials [J].
Johnson, A ;
Shareef, MY ;
Walsh, JM ;
Hatton, PV ;
van Noort, R ;
Hill, RG .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (06) :412-416