The patient perspective in health care networks

被引:9
作者
Raus, Kasper [1 ,2 ]
Mortier, Eric [1 ,3 ]
Eeckloo, Kristof [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Philosophy & Moral Sci, Fac Arts & Philosophy, Blandijnberg 2, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Health care networks; Health care organization; Ethical duties; Patient perspective; Normative framework; BUSINESS ETHICS; WAITING-TIMES; RESPONSIBILITY; PRINCIPLES; PRIVACY; JUSTICE; IMPROVE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-018-0298-x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care organization is entering a new age. Focus is increasingly shifting from individual health care institutions to interorganizational collaboration and health care networks. Much hope is set on such networks which have been argued to improve economic efficiency and quality of care. However, this does not automatically mean they are always ethically justified. A relevant question that remains is what ethical obligations or duties one can ascribe to these networks especially because networks involve many risks. Due to their often amorphous and complex structure, collective responsibility and accountability may increase while individual responsibility goes down. Main body: We argue that a business ethics approach to ethical obligations for health care networks, is problematic and we propose to opt for a patient perspective. Using the classic four principles of biomedical ethics (justice, nonmaleficence, beneficence and autonomy) it is possible to identify specific ethical duties. Based on the principle of justice, health care networks have an ethical duty to provide just and fair access for all patients and to be transparent to patients about how access is regulated. The principle of nonmaleficence implies an obligation to guarantee patient safety, whereas the principle of beneficence implies an obligation for health care networks to guarantee continuity of care in all its dimensions. Finally, the principle of autonomy is translated into a specific obligation to promote and respect patient choice. Networks that fail to meet any of these conditions are suspect and cannot be justified ethically. Conclusions: Faced with daunting challenges, the health care system is changing rapidly. Currently many hopes ride on integrated care and broad health care networks. Such networks are the topic of empirical debate, but more attention should be given to the ethical aspects. Health care networks raise new and pressing ethical issues and we are in need of a framework for assessing how and when such networks are justified.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Distance as a Barrier to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Review of the Literature [J].
Ambroggi, Massimo ;
Biasini, Claudia ;
Del Giovane, Cinzia ;
Fornari, Fabio ;
Cavanna, Luigi .
ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (12) :1378-1385
[2]   Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges [J].
Angst, Corey M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 90 :169-178
[3]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[4]  
BEAUCHAMP T. L., 2012, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, V7th
[5]   Patients' commitment to their primary physician and why it matters [J].
Berry, Leonard L. ;
Parish, Janet Turner ;
Janakiraman, Ramkumar ;
Ogburn-Russell, Lee ;
Couchman, Glen R. ;
Rayburn, William L. ;
Grisel, Jedidiah .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (01) :6-13
[6]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[7]  
Bowles EJA, 2008, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V112, P934, DOI [10.1002/cncr23250, 10.1002/cncr.23250]
[8]   Social Responsibility: A New Paradigm of Hospital Governance? [J].
Brandao, Cristina ;
Rego, Guilhermina ;
Duarte, Ivone ;
Nunes, Rui .
HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2013, 21 (04) :390-402
[9]  
Buijsen M, 2008, MED LAW, V27, P535
[10]   The effects of strategic hospital alliances on hospital efficiency [J].
Chu, Hsuan-Lien ;
Chiang, Chia-Yu .
SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2013, 33 (06) :624-635