Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Among Adults With Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation

被引:8
|
作者
Mehta, Hemalkumar B. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
An, Huijun [1 ,2 ]
Ardeshirrouhanifard, Shirin [1 ,2 ]
Raji, Mukaila A. [3 ]
Alexander, G. Caleb [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Segal, Jodi B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Drug Safety & Effectiveness, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Internal Med, Galveston, TX USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 615 N Wolfe St,E7640, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2022年 / 15卷 / 12期
关键词
atrial fibrillation; cancer; comparative effectiveness research; direct-acting oral anticoagulants; warfarin; VALIDATED METHODS; RISK; STROKE; THROMBOEMBOLISM; SENSITIVITY; INSIGHTS; OUTCOMES; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.008951
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:While clinical guidelines recommend direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over warfarin to treat isolated nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, guidelines are silent regarding nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treatment among individuals with cancer, reflecting the paucity of evidence in this setting. We quantified relative risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (primary outcomes), and all-cause and cardiovascular death (secondary outcomes) among older individuals with cancer and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation comparing DOACs and warfarin. Methods:This retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry and linked US Medicare data from 2010 through 2016, and included individuals diagnosed with cancer and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who newly initiated DOAC or warfarin. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to control confounding. We used competing risk regression for primary outcomes and cardiovascular death, and Cox proportional hazard regression for all-cause death. Results:Among 7675 individuals included in the cohort, 4244 (55.3%) received DOACs and 3431 (44.7%) warfarin. In the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, there was no statistically significant difference among DOAC and warfarin users in the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 versus 1.19 events per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 1.41 [95% CI, 0.92-2.14]), major bleeding (3.08 versus 4.49 events per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.90 [95% CI, 0.70-1.17]), and cardiovascular death (1.88 versus 3.14 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.82 [95% CI, 0.59-0.1.13]). DOAC users had significantly lower risk of all-cause death (7.09 versus 13.3 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94]) compared to warfarin users. Conclusions:Older adults with cancer and atrial fibrillation exposed to DOACs had similar risks of stroke and systemic embolism and major bleeding as those exposed to warfarin. Relative to warfarin, DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of cardiovascular death and a lower risk of all-cause death.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Among Adults with Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation
    Mehta, H. B.
    An, H.
    Ardeshirrouhanifard, S.
    Raji, M.
    Segal, J.
    Alexander, G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 70 : S6 - S6
  • [3] Comparative Effectiveness Of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation
    Ardeshirrouhanifard, Shirin
    An, Huijun
    Goyal, Ravi
    Raji, Mukaila
    Alexander, Caleb
    Mehta, Hemalkumar
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 143
  • [4] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS VERSUS WARFARIN IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Done, N.
    Li, D.
    Woolley, A.
    Rose, A. J.
    Prentice, J. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S6 - S7
  • [5] Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation
    Shah, Surbhi
    Norby, Faye L.
    Datta, Yvonne H.
    Lutsey, Pamela L.
    MacLehose, Richard F.
    Chen, Lin Y.
    Alonso, Alvaro
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2018, 2 (03) : 200 - 209
  • [6] Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin Among Obese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
    Potter, Brian J.
    Dorais, Marc
    Perreault, Sylvie
    CJC OPEN, 2022, 4 (04) : 395 - 405
  • [7] Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin among nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation
    Mehta, Hemalkumar
    An, Huijun
    Segal, Jodi
    Goodwin, James
    Caleb Alexander, G.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 73 - 73
  • [8] Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with dementia
    Fang, Chen-Wen
    Hsieh, Cheng-Yang
    Yang, Hsin-Yi
    Tsai, Ching-Fang
    Sung, Sheng-Feng
    EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [9] Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Shah, Siddharth
    Garg, Jalaj
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (10) : 1489 - 1490
  • [10] Dementia and effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin and other direct oral anticoagulants in older adults with atrial fibrillation
    Lin, Kueiyu Joshua
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    Pawar, Ajinkya
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 139 - 139