Predicting Friction System Performance with Symbolic Regression and Genetic Programming with Factor Variables

被引:5
|
作者
Kronberger, Gabriel [1 ]
Kommenda, Michael [1 ]
Promberger, Andreas [2 ]
Nickel, Falk [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Sch Informat Commun & Media, Hagenberg, Austria
[2] Miba Frictec GmbH, A-4661 Roitham, Austria
来源
GECCO'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE | 2018年
关键词
Symbolic Regression; Friction Systems; Prediction;
D O I
10.1145/3205455.3205522
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Friction systems are mechanical systems wherein friction is used for force transmission (e.g. mechanical braking systems or automatic gearboxes). For finding optimal and safe design parameters, engineers have to predict friction system performance. This is especially difficult in real-worlds applications, because it is affected by many parameters. We have used symbolic regression and genetic programming for finding accurate and trustworthy prediction models for this task. However, it is not straight-forward how nominal variables can be included. In particular, a one-hot-encoding is unsatisfactory because genetic programming tends to remove such indicator variables. We have therefore used so-called factor variables for representing nominal variables in symbolic regression models. Our results show that GP is able to produce symbolic regression models for predicting friction performance with predictive accuracy that is comparable to artificial neural networks. The symbolic regression models with factor variables are less complex than models using a one-hot encoding.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1285
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    He, Baihe
    Lu, Qiang
    Yang, Qingyun
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 946 - 954
  • [2] Statistical genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Haeri, Maryam Amir
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Folino, Gianluigi
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 447 - 469
  • [3] Compositional Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    Kossinski, Dominik
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 570 - 573
  • [4] The Inefficiency of Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Kronberger, Gabriel
    de Franca, Fabricio Olivetti
    Desmond, Harry
    Bartlett, Deaglan J.
    Kammerer, Lukas
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PPSN 2024, PT I, 2024, 15148 : 273 - 289
  • [5] Semantic schema based genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Zojaji, Zahra
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Nasiri, Hamid
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 122
  • [6] Genetic programming performance prediction and its application for symbolic regression problems
    Astarabadi, Samaneh Sadat Mousavi
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 502 : 418 - 433
  • [7] A Comparative Study on the Numerical Performance of Kaizen Programming and Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression Problems
    Ferreira, Jimena
    Ines Torres, Ana
    Pedemonte, Martin
    2019 IEEE LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (LA-CCI), 2019, : 202 - 207
  • [8] Lifetime Adaptation in Genetic Programming for the Symbolic Regression
    Merta, Jan
    Brandejsky, Tomas
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING METHODS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL. 2, 2019, 1047 : 339 - 346
  • [9] Symbol Graph Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Song, Jinglu
    Lu, Qiang
    Tian, Bozhou
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PPSN 2024, PT I, 2024, 15148 : 221 - 237
  • [10] Genetic programming with separability detection for symbolic regression
    Liu, Wei-Li
    Yang, Jiaquan
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Wang, Shibin
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (03) : 1185 - 1194