Simultaneously applying cathodal tDCS with low frequency rTMS at the motor cortex boosts inhibitory aftereffects

被引:12
作者
Han, Tao [1 ]
Xu, Zhexue [1 ]
Liu, Chunyan [1 ]
Li, Siran [1 ]
Song, Penghui [1 ]
Huang, Qian [1 ]
Zhou, Qilin [1 ]
Lin, Yicong [1 ]
Wang, Yuping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurol, 45 Changchun St, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Neuromodulat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Inst Brain Disorders, Ctr Epilepsy, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Simultaneous tDCS and rTMS; tDCS; rTMS; Motor-evoked potential amplitudes; Cortical excitability; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; EXCITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.05.017
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can modulate cortical excitability. However, the combining effect of tDCS and rTMS at the same motor cortex is unknown. New methods: We have recently developed a new stimulation protocol that simultaneously combines two well documented methods. Eleven right-handed healthy subjects undertook four sessions at the left cortical representation area of right first dorsal interosseous muscle in randomized order, the order was counter balanced. Session one was the sham control without tDCS or rTMS. Session two involved cathodal tDCS with sham rTMS. Session three involved rTMS with sham tDCS. Session four was the combination of cathodal tDCS and rTMS (tDCS-rTMS). Cathodal tDCS was applied at 1 mA, and 1200 rTMS pulses were applied at 1 Hz with 90% resting motor threshold (RMT). All stimulation durations lasted for 20 min. RMT was monitored pre- and post-stimulation immediately after finishing the stimulation. Single pulse TMS induced MEP amplitudes were monitored before and after stimulation for 30 min afterwards. Results: Neither stimulus modality changed the value of RMT. As compared to sham stimulation, MEP amplitudes decreased in other three conditions. MEP amplitudes in tDCS-rTMS were much more inhibited than either tDCS or rTMS alone. Comparison with existing methods: We could reproduce inhibitory effect of 1 mA cathodal tDCS and 1 Hz rTMS in concordance with previous literature. The novel simultaneous tDCS-rTMS stimulation protocol can induce enhanced excitability change than either tDCS or rTMS. Conclusions: Simultaneous application of cathodal tDCS with low frequency rTMS produces a stronger inhibitory effect.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans
    Antal, A
    Nitsche, MA
    Kruse, W
    Kincses, TZ
    Hoffmann, KP
    Paulus, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 16 (04) : 521 - 527
  • [2] Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain
    Ardolino, G
    Bossi, B
    Barbieri, S
    Priori, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (02): : 653 - 663
  • [3] Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans
    Batsikadze, G.
    Moliadze, V.
    Paulus, W.
    Kuo, M. -F.
    Nitsche, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07): : 1987 - 2000
  • [4] Magnetic stimulation intensity modulates motor inhibition
    Berger, U.
    Korngreen, A.
    Bar-Gad, I.
    Friedman, A.
    Wolfus, S.
    Yeshurun, Y.
    Lavidor, M.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 504 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [5] General indices to characterize the electrical response of the cerebral cortex to TMS
    Casali, Adenauer G.
    Casarotto, Silvia
    Rosanova, Mario
    Mariotti, Maurizio
    Massimini, Marcello
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 49 (02) : 1459 - 1468
  • [6] Chen R, 2000, MUSCLE NERVE, pS26
  • [7] Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Chen, R
    Classen, J
    Gerloff, C
    Celnik, P
    Wassermann, EM
    Hallett, M
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) : 1398 - 1403
  • [8] Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
    Cirillo, G.
    Di Pino, G.
    Capone, F.
    Ranieri, F.
    Florio, L.
    Todisco, V.
    Tedeschi, G.
    Funke, K.
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [9] Effect of individual anatomy on resting motor threshold - Computed electric field as a measure of cortical excitability
    Danner, Nils
    Kononen, Mervi
    Saisanen, Laura
    Laitinen, Rita
    Mervaala, Esa
    Julkunen, Petro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2012, 203 (02) : 298 - 304
  • [10] Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    Pilato, F.
    Dileone, M.
    Profice, P.
    Oliviero, A.
    Mazzone, P.
    Insola, A.
    Ranieri, F.
    Tonali, P. A.
    Rothwell, J. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2008, 586 (18): : 4481 - 4487