Sensory Processing Sensitivity as a Predictor of Proactive Work Behavior and a Moderator of the Job Complexity-Proactive Work Behavior Relationship

被引:3
|
作者
Schmitt, Antje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Psychol, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
job complexity; proactive work behavior; sensory processing sensitivity; employees; person-environment fit; TASK COMPLEXITY; ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY; EMPLOYEE PROACTIVITY; THINGS HAPPEN; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; STRESS; METAANALYSIS; INHIBITION; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates the role of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) as a predictor of employees' proactive work behavior. SPS is a multidimensional concept that depicts differences in people's sensory awareness, processing, and reactivity to internal and external influences. Based on research on SPS as grounded in a heightened sensitivity of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems, it was argued that the relationships with task proactivity and personal initiative as indicators of proactive work behavior differ for the three SPS dimensions. Furthermore, based on the person-environment fit perspective, SPS was assumed to moderate the relationship between employees' job complexity and proactivity. The hypotheses were tested in two two-wave studies (N = 215 and N = 126). Across both studies, ease of excitation (EOE; i.e., the tendency to be easily overwhelmed by changes) was unrelated to proactivity. Low sensory threshold (LST; i.e., unpleasant arousal from external stimuli) was negatively related to personal initiative, only in Study 2, but it did not predict task proactivity. Meanwhile, aesthetic sensitivity (i.e., AES; awareness of and openness to positive stimuli) was positively related to proactivity, but in Study 2, this relationship could only be established for personal initiative. Moreover, job complexity was positively related to proactivity for those employees high but not for those low in AES. EOE and LST did not act as moderators. This study offers evidence of positive behavioral implications among highly sensitive persons when dealing with job complexity. Overall, the study presents an interesting point of departure for the role of SPS in employee proactivity that calls for more research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Entrepreneurial leadership, nurses’ proactive work behavior, and career adaptability: a structural equation model
    Nadia Hassan Ali Awad
    Heba Ahmed Hamza Zabady
    Gehan Galal Elbialy
    Heba Mohamed Al-anwer Ali Ashour
    BMC Nursing, 23
  • [42] Measuring the impact of learning organization on proactive work behavior: mediating role of employee resilience
    Malik, Parul
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 15 (03) : 325 - 344
  • [43] Personality as a predictor of job performance and counterproductive work behavior: the importance of specificity in personality measurement
    de Vries, Anita
    de Vries, Reinout E.
    Born, Marise Ph.
    van den Berg, Remko H.
    GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2014, 27 (04): : 407 - 427
  • [44] The Impact of AI Usage on Innovation Behavior at Work: The Moderating Role of Openness and Job Complexity
    Zhang, Qichao
    Liao, Ganli
    Ran, Xueying
    Wang, Feiwen
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2025, 15 (04)
  • [45] Work-related identity discrepancy and employee proactive behavior: The effects of face-pressure and benevolent leadership
    Wang, Ping
    Zou, Linhan
    Huang, Meng
    Amdu, Midru Kidist
    Guo, Tiantian
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2024, 248
  • [46] Composing the same song: when and how high-performance work systems can stimulate proactive behavior
    Lin, Chiou-Shiu
    Xiao, Ran
    Huang, Pei-Chi
    Huang, Liang-Chih
    PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2022, 51 (09) : 2388 - 2403
  • [47] The role of work authenticity in linking strengths use to career satisfaction and proactive behavior: a two-wave study
    Matsuo, Makoto
    CAREER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 25 (06) : 617 - 630
  • [48] Servant leadership and employee voice behavior: the role of employee work reflection and employee proactive personality
    Xu, Zelei
    Gu, Yu
    Wang, Hongyu
    Liu, Lili
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [49] Would people persist in proactive work behavior? Comparing the motivation and resource-depletion pathways
    Zijun Cai
    Xiaofei Teng
    Qiong Wang
    Jing Qian
    Wei Shi
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 25755 - 25772
  • [50] Exploring the impact of inclusive leadership on proactive work behavior in nonprofit organization: The mediating role of the relational psychological contract
    Rogozinska-Pawelczyk, Anna
    Sudolska, Agata
    NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP, 2024, 35 (02) : 399 - 432