Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms

被引:49
作者
Kozegar, Ehsan [1 ]
Soryani, Mohsen [1 ]
Minaei, Behrouz [1 ]
Domingues, Ines [2 ]
机构
[1] IUST, Dept Comp Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Porto, INESC TEC, Fac Engn, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
Classification; detection; FROC analysis; mammograms; masses; COMPUTERIZED DETECTION; BREAST MASSES; CLASSIFICATION; FEATURES; IMAGES;
D O I
10.4103/0973-1482.126453
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Context: Mammography is the most effective procedure for an early detection of the breast abnormalities. Masses are a type of abnormality, which are very difficult to be visually detected on mammograms. Aims: In this paper an efficient method for detection of masses in mammograms is implemented. Settings and Design: The proposed mass detector consists of two major steps. In the first step, several suspicious regions are extracted from the mammograms using an adaptive thresholding technique. In the second step, false positives originating by the previous stage are reduced by a machine learning approach. Materials and Methods: All modules of the mass detector were assessed on mini-MIAS database. In addition, the algorithm was tested on INBreast database for more validation. Results: According to FROC analysis, our mass detection algorithm outperforms other competing methods. Conclusions: We should not just insist on sensitivity in the segmentation phase because if we forgot FP rate, and our goal was just higher sensitivity, then the learning algorithm would be biased more toward false positives and the sensitivity would decrease dramatically in the false positive reduction phase. Therefore, we should consider the mass detection problem as a cost sensitive problem because misclassification costs are not the same in this type of problems.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 600
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, DIGITAL MAMMO, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11999-016-4732-4
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 3 INT C DEV BME VI
[3]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[4]   A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography [J].
Eltonsy, Nevine H. ;
Tourassi, Georgia D. ;
Elmaghraby, Adel S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2007, 26 (06) :880-889
[5]   Content-based image retrieval applied to BI-RADS tissue classification in screening mammography [J].
Engracia de Oliveira, Julia Epischina ;
Araujo, Arnaldo de Albuquerque ;
Deserno, Thomas M. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 3 (01) :24-31
[6]   A massive lesion detection algorithm in mammography [J].
Fauci, F ;
Raso, G ;
Magro, R ;
Forni, G ;
Lauria, A ;
Bagnasco, S ;
Cerello, P ;
Cheran, SC ;
Torres, EL ;
Bellotti, R ;
De Carlo, F ;
Gargano, G ;
Tangaro, S ;
De Mitri, I ;
De Nunzio, G ;
Cataldo, R .
PHYSICA MEDICA, 2005, 21 (01) :23-30
[7]  
Hall M., 2009, SIGKDD Explorations, V11, P10, DOI DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278
[8]   TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION [J].
HARALICK, RM ;
SHANMUGAM, K ;
DINSTEIN, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06) :610-621
[9]   Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms [J].
Kobatake, H ;
Murakami, M ;
Takeo, H ;
Nawano, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (05) :369-378
[10]   Automated detection of masses in mammograms by local adaptive thresholding [J].
Kom, Guillaume ;
Tiedeu, Alain ;
Kom, Martin .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 37 (01) :37-48