INFLUENCE OF INTERIMPLANT DISTANCES AND PLACEMENT DEPTH ON PAPILLA FORMATION AND CRESTAL RESORPTION: A CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY IN DOGS

被引:41
作者
Novaes, Arthur B., Jr. [1 ]
Barros, Raquel R. M.
Muglia, Valdir A. [2 ]
Borges, Germana J.
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol, Dept Buccomaxillofacial Surg & Traumatol & Period, Sch Dent, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Restorat Dent, Sch Dent, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
dental implants; interimplant distance; crestal bone levels; gingival papilla; bone resorption; contact point; SUBMERGED IMPLANTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; BONE CHANGES; HISTOMETRIC EVALUATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BIOLOGIC WIDTH; MICROGAP; TISSUES; HARD; SOFT;
D O I
10.1563/1548-1336-35.1.18
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Among the factors that contribute to the papilla formation and crestal bone preservation between contiguous implants, this animal study clinically and radiographically evaluated the interimplant distances (IDs) of 2 and 3 mm and the placement depths of Morse cone connection implants restored with platform switch. Bilateral mandibular premolars of 6 dogs were extracted, and after 12 weeks, the implants were placed. Four experimental groups were constituted: subcrestally with ID of 2 mm (2 SCL) and 3 mm (3 SCL) and crestally with ID of 2 mm (2 CL) and 3 mm (3 CL). Metallic crowns were immediately installed with a distance of 3 mm between the contact point and the bone crest. Eight weeks later, clinical measurements were performed to evaluate papilla formation, and radiographic images were taken to analyze the crestal bone remodeling. The subcrestal groups achieved better levels of papillae formation when compared with the crestal groups, with a significant difference between the 3 SCL and 3 CL groups (P = .026). Radiographically, the crestal bone preservation was also better in the subcrestal groups, with statistically significant differences between the 2SCL and 2CL groups (P = .002) and between the 3SCL and 3CL groups (P = .008). With the present conditions, it could be concluded that subcrestal implant placement had a positive impact on papilla formation and crestal bone preservation, which could favor the esthetic of anterior regions. However, the IDs of 2 and 3 mm did not show significantly different results.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 27
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abrahamsson, 1998, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V9, P281
[2]   A prospective multicenter study using two different surgical approaches in the mandible with turned branemark implants:: Conventional loading using fixed prostheses [J].
Becktor, Jonas P. ;
Isaksson, Sten ;
Billstrom, Camilla .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (04) :179-185
[3]  
Binon PP, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P76
[4]  
Cappiello M, 2008, INT J PERIODONT REST, V28, P347
[5]  
Chou Cherng-Tzeh, 2004, J Oral Implantol, V30, P134, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2004)30<134:APICBL>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible [J].
Cochran, DL ;
Hermann, JS ;
Schenk, RK ;
Higginbottom, FL ;
Buser, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (02) :186-197
[8]  
Covani Ugo, 2006, Implant Dent, V15, P298, DOI 10.1097/01.id.0000226823.58425.19
[9]   Outcome analysis of immediately placed, immediately restored implants in the esthetic area: The clinical relevance of different interimplant distances [J].
Degidi, Marco ;
Novaes, Arthur Belem, Jr. ;
Nardi, Diego ;
Piattelli, Adriano .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 79 (06) :1056-1061
[10]   The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI(R) implants on marginal soft and hard tissues [J].
Hammerle, CHF ;
Bragger, U ;
Burgin, W ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (02) :111-119