Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales: Where do we stand?

被引:329
作者
de Vente, Joris [1 ,2 ]
Poesen, Jean [3 ]
Verstraeten, Gert [3 ]
Govers, Gerard [3 ]
Vanmaercke, Matthias [3 ,4 ]
Van Rompaey, Anton [3 ]
Arabkhedri, Mahmood [5 ]
Boix-Fayos, Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] CEBAS CSIC, Soil & Water Conservat Dept, Murcia, Spain
[2] EEZA CSIC, Desertificat & Geoecol Dept, Almeria, Spain
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Geog, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Res Fdn Flanders FWO, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Soil Conservat & Watershed Management Res Inst, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Soil erosion modelling; Model validation; Catchment scale; Global change; Model accuracy; Scenario analysis; LAND-USE CHANGE; SOURCE POLLUTION MODEL; ROCK FRAGMENT COVER; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT; FLUVIAL SEDIMENT; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENTS; TERRESTRIAL SEDIMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COMBINING FIELD; EVOLUTION MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.014
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Assessments of the implications of soil erosion require quantification of soil erosion rates (SE) and sediment yield (SSY) at regional scales under present and future climate and land use scenarios. A range of models is available to predict SE and SSY, but a critical evaluation of these models is lacking. Here, we evaluate 14 models based on 32 published studies and over 700 selected catchments. Evaluation criteria include: (1) prediction accuracy, (2) knowledge gain on dominant soil erosion processes, (3) data and calibration requirements, and (4) applicability in global change scenario studies. Results indicate that modelling of SE and SSY strongly depends on the spatial and temporal scales considered. In large catchments (> 10,000 km(2)), most accurate predictions of suspended sediment yield are obtained by nonlinear regression models like BQART, WBMsed, or Pelletier's model. For medium-sized catchments, best results are obtained by factorial scoring models like PSIAC, FSM and SSY Index, which also support identification of dominant erosion processes. Most other models (e.g., WATEM-SEDEM, AGNPS, LISEM, PESERA, and SWAT) represent only a selection of erosion and sediment transport processes. Consequently, these models only provide reliable results where the considered processes are indeed dominant Identification of sediment sources and sinks requires spatially distributed models, which, on average, have lower model accuracy and require more input data and calibration efforts than spatially lumped models. Of these models, most accurate predictions with least data requirements were provided by SPADS and WATEM-SEDEM. Priorities for model development include: (I) simulation of point sources of sediment, (2) balancing model complexity and the quality of input data, (3) simulation of the impact of soil and water conservation measures, and (4) incorporation of dynamic land use and climate scenarios. Prediction of the impact of global change on SE and SSY in medium sized catchments is one of the main challenges in future model development. No single model fulfils all modelling objectives; a further integration of field observations and different model concepts is needed to obtain better contemporary and future predictions of SE and SSY. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 29
页数:14
相关论文
共 173 条
[1]   Geomorphic controls on Andean denudation rates [J].
Aalto, R ;
Dunne, T ;
Guyot, JL .
JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY, 2006, 114 (01) :85-99
[2]   210Pb geochronology of flood events in large tropical river systems [J].
Aalto, Rolf ;
Nittrouer, Charles A. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2012, 370 (1966) :2040-2074
[3]   Soil erosion and sediment delivery in a mountain catchment under scenarios of land use change using a spatially distributed numerical model [J].
Alatorre, L. C. ;
Begueria, S. ;
Lana-Renault, N. ;
Navas, A. ;
Garcia-Ruiz, J. M. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (05) :1321-1334
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1968, REP WAT MAN SUBC FAC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Handbook of erosion modeling, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444328455.CH7
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 5 FED INT SED C IN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 57 UNGI UPPS U
[8]  
[Anonymous], MANAGE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AGR HDB
[10]  
[Anonymous], HDB EROSION MODELLIN