Optimal design for hydraulic efficiency performance of free-water-surface constructed wetlands

被引:87
作者
Su, Tsung-Min [2 ]
Yang, Sheng-Chi [2 ]
Shih, Shang-Shu [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Hong-Yuan [3 ]
机构
[1] TIIWE, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hydrotech Res Inst, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
Free-water-surface constructed wetland (FWS CW); Hydraulic efficiency; Aspect ratio; Obstruction; HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW; WASTE-WATER; REMOVAL; RETENTION; EFFLUENT; SYSTEMS; PONDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.024
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study aims to provide the optimal design of different free-water-surface constructed wetlands (FWS CWs) according to hydraulic efficiency index (lambda). This index is mainly determined by the position and distribution of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) curve of a wetland. HRT can be defined as the period during which each portion of fluid remains in the wetland under the influence of flow uniformity. Flow uniformity of a wetland is primarily affected by the aspect ratio of the wetland (AR(w)), the inlet and outlet configuration, and the obstruction designation. The important findings about these three factors in this study are as follows: 1. When the AR(w), is greater than 5, the X will reach 0.9 or even higher. If the project site or field area cannot meet the theoretical standard, the recommended AR(w) is higher than 1.88 so that the X will be higher than 0.7. 2. The best configuration of inlet and outlet is uniform-midpoint. Meanwhile, midpoint-midpoint is preferable to corner-corner. 3. According to the multi-linear regression of numerical experiment results, it is suggested that the obstruction width-to-wetland width ratio (w(ob)/w(w)), rather than the amount of obstruction, is the most significant influential factor in the performance of hydraulic efficiency. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1207
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WETLANDS
[2]  
*BYU EMRL, 2002, SURF WAT MOD SYST
[3]  
Cowan W.L., 1956, Agric. Eng, V37, P473, DOI DOI 10.2514/2.6901
[4]  
Dal C.L., 2000, P 7 INT C WETL SYST, V2, P539
[5]   Relationship between hydraulic efficiency and phosphorus removal in a submerged aquatic vegetation-dominated treatment wetland [J].
Dierberg, FE ;
Juston, JJ ;
DeBusk, TA ;
Pietro, K ;
Gu, BH .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 25 (01) :9-23
[6]  
DINGES R, 1978, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V50, P833
[7]  
Fogler H.S., 2020, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, V6th
[8]   Modelling of different measures for improving removal in a storm pond [J].
German, J ;
Jansons, K ;
Svensson, G ;
Karlsson, D ;
Gustafsson, LG .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (05) :105-112
[9]   Overview: Surface flow constructed wetlands [J].
Kadlec, RH .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 32 (03) :1-12
[10]   OVERLAND-FLOW IN WETLANDS - VEGETATION RESISTANCE [J].
KADLEC, RH .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1990, 116 (05) :691-706