Bilateral tax agreement and FDI inflows: Evidence from Hong Kong investment in the Mainland China

被引:11
作者
Luo, Changyuan [1 ]
Luo, Qin [2 ]
Zeng, Shuai [3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Inst World Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Publ Finance & Adm, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bilateral tax agreement; FDI; Hong Kong; Investment diversion effect; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; DIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES; TREATIES; LOCATION; DETERMINANTS; INFERENCE; DIFFERENCE; TAXATION; IMPACT; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101788
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explains the changes in the composition of the source countries or regions of FDI in China from the perspective of taxation. Based on FDI data from 2003 to 2012, the empirical test, employing the difference-in-differences (DID) model, shows that, after the implementation of the tax agreement between the mainland and Hong Kong in 2007, FDI from Hong Kong increased significantly. After the integration of domestic and foreign-funded enterprise income tax systems in 2008, Hong Kong capital inflows increased even more drastically. The extended analyses show that, the substantial increase in Hong Kong capital after the implementation of this bilateral tax agreement was partly related to the diversion effect of investment. MNCs might have diverted investment from other tax havens to the mainland via Hong Kong, resulting in a sharp increase in the amount and proportion of Hong Kong investment, whereas those of FDI from other tax havens have declined.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Diamond, Alexis ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (490) :493-505
[2]   Consumption Responses to Temporary Tax Incentives: Evidence from State Sales Tax Holidays [J].
Agarwal, Sumit ;
Marwell, Nathan ;
McGranahan, Leslie .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2017, 9 (04) :1-27
[3]   Trade costs and location of foreign firms in China [J].
Amiti, Mary ;
Javorcik, Beata Smarzynska .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 85 (1-2) :129-149
[4]  
Aykut Dilek, 2017, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8046
[5]   International taxation and multinational firm location decisions [J].
Barrios, Salvador ;
Huizinga, Harry ;
Laeven, Luc ;
Nicodeme, Gaetan .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (11-12) :946-958
[6]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[7]  
Blonigen B. A., 2002, Working Paper 8834
[8]   The effects of bilateral tax treaties on USFDI activity [J].
Blonigen, BA ;
Davies, RB .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2004, 11 (05) :601-622
[9]   The Differential Effects of Bilateral Tax Treaties [J].
Blonigen, Bruce A. ;
Oldenski, Lindsay ;
Sly, Nicholas .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 6 (02) :1-18
[10]  
Busse M., 2007, EUROPEAN J POLITICAL, V23, P397, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2006.02.003, 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.02.003]