Translating personalized medicine using new genetic technologies in clinical practice: the ethical issues

被引:32
作者
Ormond, Kelly E. [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Mildred K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Genet, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Ctr Biomed Eth, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
ethics; genetics; genomics; personalized medicine; translation; WHOLE-GENOME; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; LICENSING PRACTICES; EXOME; PATENTS; MUTATIONS; SCIENCE; LANDSCAPE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.2217/pme.13.104
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The integration of new genetic technologies into clinical practice holds great promise for the personalization of medical care, particularly the use of large-scale DNA sequencing for genome-wide genetic testing. However, these technologies also yield unprecedented amounts of information whose clinical implications are not fully understood, and we are still developing technical standards for measuring sequence accuracy. These technical and clinical challenges raise ethical issues that are similar to but qualitatively different from those that we are accustomed to dealing with for traditional medical genetics. The sheer amount of information afforded by genome sequencing requires rethinking of how to implement core ethical principles including, but not limited to: informed consent, privacy and data ownership and sharing, technology regulation, issues of access, particularly as new technology is integrated into clinical practice, and issues of potential stigma and impact on perceptions of disability. In this article, we will review the issues of informed consent, privacy, data ownership and technology regulation as they relate to the emerging field of personalized medicine and genomics.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 222
页数:12
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Anderson A., 2011, U WASHINGTON DEBUTS
[2]  
Annuziata C, 2010, REPORTS, V2, P10
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NY TIMES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Test Methods for Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Tapes, chapter PSTC-101, V15th, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ACM T KNOWL DISCOV D
[6]   Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome [J].
Ashley, Euan A. ;
Butte, Atul J. ;
Wheeler, Matthew T. ;
Chen, Rong ;
Klein, Teri E. ;
Dewey, Frederick E. ;
Dudley, Joel T. ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Pavlovic, Aleksandra ;
Morgan, Alexander A. ;
Pushkarev, Dmitry ;
Neff, Norma F. ;
Hudgins, Louanne ;
Gong, Li ;
Hodges, Laura M. ;
Berlin, Dorit S. ;
Thorn, Caroline F. ;
Sangkuhl, Katrin ;
Hebert, Joan M. ;
Woon, Mark ;
Sagreiya, Hersh ;
Whaley, Ryan ;
Knowles, Joshua W. ;
Chou, Michael F. ;
Thakuria, Joseph V. ;
Rosenbaum, Abraham M. ;
Zaranek, Alexander Wait ;
Church, George M. ;
Greely, Henry T. ;
Quake, Stephen R. ;
Altman, Russ B. .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9725) :1525-1535
[7]  
Australian Law Reform Commission, 1996, PROT HUM GEN INF AUS
[8]   Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule [J].
Benitez, Kathleen ;
Malin, Bradley .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 17 (02) :169-177
[9]   Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time [J].
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Khoury, Muin J. ;
Evans, James P. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (06) :499-504
[10]   Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project [J].
Biesecker, Leslie G. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :393-398