Assessment of implementation fidelity in diabetes self-management education programs: A systematic review

被引:37
作者
Schinckus, Louise [1 ]
Van den Broucke, Stephan [1 ]
Housiaux, Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Psychol Sci Res Inst, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
关键词
Diabetes; Self-management education; Implementation fidelity; Literature review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TREATMENT INTEGRITY; PREVENTION PROGRAM; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PRIMARY-CARE; INTERVENTION; HEALTH; MODEL; OUTCOMES; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: As diabetes requires extensive self-care, self-management education is widely recommended to enhance the effectiveness and reduce the costs of treatment. While a variety of diabetes self-management (DSM) programs are available, the conditions for their effective implementation are not well documented. This paper reviews the literature on implementation fidelity (IF), the degree to which programs are delivered as intended, as a factor influencing the effectiveness of diabetes education. Methods: Medical, psychological and educational research databases were searched to identify published studies on diabetes education describing the implementation process. Studies detailing the intervention adherence/fidelity/integrity were included to assess the way key elements of IF were addressed. Results: From an initial 418 abstracts, 20 published papers were retained for an in-depth analysis focusing on the components of IF. Intervention content was mainly assessed through observation, whereas intervention dose was more often assessed through self-report measures. Only one study addressed the relationship between IF and intervention effectiveness. Conclusion: Despite the importance of IF to achieve program outcomes, IF of DSM programs remains largely under-investigated. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Amer Diabet Assoc, 2014, DIABETES CARE, V37, pS81, DOI [10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc12-s064, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc12-s011, 10.2337/dc10-S062, 10.2337/dc11-S011]
  • [2] American Association Diabetes Educators, 2013, 7TM SELF CAR BEH POS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Diabetes atlas
  • [4] Challenges and Opportunities for Implementing Diabetes Self-Management Guidelines
    Appiah, Bernard
    Hong, Yan
    Ory, Marcia G.
    Helduser, Janet W.
    Begaye, Dawn
    Bolin, Jane N.
    Forjuoh, Samuel N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 90 - 92
  • [5] HISTORICAL GLIMPSES OF PATIENT EDUCATION IN THE UNITED-STATES
    BARTLETT, EE
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1986, 8 (02) : 135 - 149
  • [6] Interventions to promote diabetes self-management: State of the science
    Brown, SA
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1999, 25 (06) : 52 - 61
  • [7] A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity
    Carroll, Christopher
    Patterson, Malcolm
    Wood, Stephen
    Booth, Andrew
    Rick, Jo
    Balain, Shashi
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2
  • [8] Physical Activity Program Delivery by Professionals Versus Volunteers: The TEAM Randomized Trial
    Castro, Cynthia M.
    Pruitt, Leslie A.
    Buman, Matthew P.
    King, Abby C.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 30 (03) : 285 - 294
  • [9] A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge
    Century, Jeanne
    Rudnick, Mollie
    Freeman, Cassie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2010, 31 (02) : 199 - 218
  • [10] Implementing the community health worker model within diabetes management - Challenges and lessons learned from programs across the United States
    Cherrington, Andrea
    Ayala, Guadalupe X.
    Amick, Halle
    Allison, Jeroan
    Corbie-Smith, Giselle
    Scarinci, Isabel
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2008, 34 (05) : 824 - 833