The autonomy of government agencies in Germany and Norway: explaining variation in management autonomy across countries and agencies

被引:23
作者
Bach, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Hertie Sch Governance, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
administrative tradition; agency autonomy; delegation; formal structure; political control; task characteristics; INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES; POLITICIANS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1177/0020852313514527
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article reports the results of a comparative analysis of the human resources management (HRM) autonomy of government agencies in Germany and Norway. Whereas the academic literature largely focuses on ministry-agency relations in countries where agencies have been only recently established, these two countries have a long tradition of delegation to agencies outside ministerial departments. However, although sharing a broadly similar administrative tradition, each country differs with regard to the management reform trajectory. This allows an empirical test to be carried out of the effects of management reforms on HRM autonomy, drawing on survey data. The article also discusses the literature on how task characteristics and formal agency structure supposedly affect agency autonomy and puts these claims to an empirical test. The empirical analysis reveals cross-country differences, a somewhat limited effect of task characteristics, and a clear effect of formal structure on de facto HRM autonomy, especially in the German context.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 361
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Anderson B., 2006, OECD J BUDGETING, V6, P7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STRUCTURE CULTURE GO
[3]  
[Anonymous], UNBUNDLED GOVT CRITI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Delegated Governance and the British State: Walking without Order
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, AGENCIES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, UNBUNDLED GOVT CRITI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Die politische Steuerung der Verwaltung. Eine empirische Studie uber politisch-administrative Interaktionen auf der Bundesebene
[8]  
Bach T, 2010, GOV PUBLIC MANAG, P89
[9]   Animals in the administrative zoo: organizational change and agency autonomy in Germany [J].
Bach, Tobias ;
Jann, Werner .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 76 (03) :443-468
[10]  
Christensen J., 2001, POLITICIANS BUREAUCR, P119