Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements as Very Early Predictive Markers of Response to Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastasis: A Preliminary Investigation of Reproducibility and Diagnostic Value

被引:22
作者
Deckers, Filip [1 ]
De Foer, Bert [1 ]
Van Mieghem, Francois [1 ]
Botelberge, Thomas [2 ]
Weytjens, Reinhilde [3 ]
Padhani, Anwar [4 ]
Pouillon, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] GZA Sint Augustinus, Dept Radiol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] GZA Sint Augustinus, Dept Gastroenterol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] GZA Sint Augustinus, Dept Radiat Therapy & Oncol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Mt Vernon Canc Ctr, Paul Strickland Scanner Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
关键词
diffusion weighted magnetic resonance; liver metastasis; response evaluation; reproducibility; apparent diffusion coefficient measurement; TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; WEIGHTED MR; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; TUMOR RESPONSE; IMAGING BIOMARKER; LIVER METASTASIS; BREATH-HOLD; CANCER; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.24359
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility and diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as an early predictor of response to chemotherapy of liver metastasis in routine clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of 20 patients with histologically proven primary tumors with liver metastases was undertaken. Diffusion weighted MRI was performed twice before and 12-14 days after the start of treatment. Absolute and liver normalized ADC values were calculated. Bland Altman statistics were used to assess the reproducibility of ADC change for predicting lesion response as measured by RECIST. Results: Nineteen of 31 metastases responded. Significant increases in absolute and normalized ADC values were found in responding (mean +208.7 x 10(-6) m(2)/s and +18% respectively, both P < 0.001) compared with non-responding lesions (mean +98.6 x 10(-6) m(2)/s and 2%, respectively, P - 0.09 and 0.519). Reproducibility was better using normalized ADC compared with absolute ADC values (within patient coefficient of variability 8.0% and 10.1%, respectively). Using the repeatability threshold of +22.3% for normalized ADC, only 8 of 19 responding and all but one nonresponding lesions could be prospectively detected. Conclusion: Increases in ADC values in responding liver metastases occurred within days after the start of chemo-therapy but were of smaller magnitude than the variability of ADC measurement. These preliminary data suggest that the presently used technique is not reliable enough to predict final response at such an early time point in individual lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 456
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases
    Andreou, A.
    Koh, D. M.
    Collins, D. J.
    Blackledge, M.
    Wallace, T.
    Leach, M. O.
    Orton, M. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) : 428 - 434
  • [2] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [3] Phase II Study of Cediranib, an Oral Pan-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Batchelor, Tracy T.
    Duda, Dan G.
    di Tomaso, Emmanuelle
    Ancukiewicz, Marek
    Plotkin, Scott R.
    Gerstner, Elizabeth
    Eichler, April F.
    Drappatz, Jan
    Hochberg, Fred H.
    Benner, Thomas
    Louis, David N.
    Cohen, Kenneth S.
    Chea, Houng
    Exarhopoulos, Alexis
    Loeffler, Jay S.
    Moses, Marsha A.
    Ivy, Percy
    Sorensen, A. Gregory
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Jain, Rakesh K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (17) : 2817 - 2823
  • [4] Early Response of Hepatic Malignancies to Locoregional Therapy-Value of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
    Bonekamp, Susanne
    Shen, Jialin
    Salibi, Nouha
    Lai, Hong C.
    Geschwind, Jeff
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [5] Short- and Midterm Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements at 3.0-T Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Abdomen
    Braithwaite, Adam C.
    Dale, Brian M.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (02) : 459 - 465
  • [6] Chemoembolization of hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma: Assessment of response with contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI
    Buijs, Manon
    Vossen, Josephina A.
    Hong, Kelvin
    Georgiades, Christos S.
    Geschwind, Jean-Francois H.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (01) : 285 - 289
  • [7] Apparent diffusion coefficient: Potential imaging biomarker for prediction and early detection of response to chemotherapy in hepatic metastases
    Cui, Yong
    Zhang, Xiao-Peng
    Sun, Ying-Shi
    Tang, Lei
    Shen, Lin
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) : 894 - 900
  • [8] Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Value of Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Using the Spleen as Reference Organ
    Do, Richard K. G.
    Chandanara, Hersh
    Felker, Ely
    Hajdu, Cristina H.
    Babb, James S.
    Kim, Danny
    Taouli, Bachir
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (03) : 671 - 676
  • [9] Early prediction of anticancer effects with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with colorectal liver metastases following selective internal radiotherapy
    Dudeck, Oliver
    Zeile, Martin
    Wybranski, Christian
    Schulmeister, Alice
    Fischbach, Frank
    Pech, Maciej
    Wieners, Gero
    Ruehl, Ricarda
    Grosser, Oliver
    Amthauer, Holger
    Ricke, Jens
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (11) : 2699 - 2706
  • [10] Change in diffusion weighted MRI during liver cancer radiotherapy: Preliminary observations
    Eccles, Cynthia L.
    Haider, Ehsan A.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Fung, Sharon
    Lockwood, Gina
    Dawson, Laura A.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2009, 48 (07) : 1034 - 1043