Acceptability of a cessation intervention for pregnant smokers: a qualitative study guided by Normalization Process Theory

被引:0
作者
Jones, Susan E. [1 ]
Hamilton, Sharon [1 ]
Bell, Ruth [2 ]
Araujo-Soares, Vera [3 ]
White, Martin [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Teesside Univ, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Borough Rd, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, Cleveland, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Twente, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Complex intervention; Normalization Process Theory; Process evaluation; Qualitative; Smoking cessation; Pregnancy; Opt out; Stop smoking services; SMOKING-CESSATION; WOMEN; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-020-09608-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundSmoking during pregnancy has serious consequences for maternal and child health. An intervention package to embed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance (babyClear (c)) was delivered across maternity and stop smoking services (SSS) within an English region, to support pregnant women to stop smoking. We aimed to ascertain acceptability among pregnant smokers receiving the intervention.MethodsPregnant smokers who received the intervention and participated in the study were interviewed, first at around 16weeks of pregnancy (n=17) and again several weeks later (n=8) or postpartum (n=3). Interview schedules were informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework; interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically, using the Framework method and NPT. Findings are grouped according to the four NPT concepts.ResultsCoherence: Carbon monoxide monitoring appeared to make sense; women were motivated to quit by being monitored. Cognitive participation: When linked to a professional discourse of caring and concern, some women were prompted to engage with the SS message. Women were more guarded in their reaction to initial contact from the SSS; reporting attending appointments successfully, or in some cases, experiencing problems that decreased engagement and made quitting harder. Collective action: Where women continued to smoke or failed to attend SSS appointments, an extra intervention was delivered, the Risk Perception Tool (RPT), which often prompted pregnant women to act. Reflexive monitoring: Most women accepted the need for a hard-hitting approach (RPT) and, while it distressed them at the time, they claimed they were subsequently grateful for it. SSS intervention post-RPT was seen as supportive, partly because it often involved home visits. Aspects of family inclusion in babyClear (c) were reported as beneficial. In Trusts where women experienced services as less focused on prioritising the stop smoking message, less well integrated or reported maternity staff as less adept at delivering the RPT, women found babyClear (c) less acceptable overall.ConclusionsThe babyClear (c) package was acceptable to pregnant smokers interviewed during and shortly after pregnancy and, in some cases, to promote quitting. However, some contexts were more optimal than others, leading to variation in acceptability overall.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Integration of tuberculosis and HIV services: Exploring the perspectives of co-infected patients in Ghana
    Anku, Prince Justin
    Amo-Adjei, Joshua
    Doku, David Teye
    Kumi-Kyereme, Akwasi
    [J]. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 13 (09) : 1192 - 1203
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, SMOK REPR LIF IMP SM
  • [3] [Anonymous], Developing and evaluating complex interventions
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, PUBL HLTH GUID 26 QU
  • [5] What helps and hinders midwives in engaging with pregnant women about stopping smoking? A cross-sectional survey of perceived implementation difficulties among midwives in the North East of England
    Beenstock, Jane
    Sniehotta, Falko F.
    White, Martin
    Bell, Ruth
    Milne, Eugene M. G.
    Araujo-Soares, Vera
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [6] Evaluation of a complex healthcare intervention to increase smoking cessation in pregnant women: interrupted time series analysis with economic evaluation
    Bell, Ruth
    Glinianaia, Svetlana V.
    van der Waal, Zelda
    Close, Andrew
    Moloney, Eoin
    Jones, Susan
    Araujo-Soares, Vera
    Hamilton, Sharon
    Milne, Eugene M. G.
    Shucksmith, Janet
    Vale, Luke
    Willmore, Martyn
    White, Martin
    Rushton, Steven
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2018, 27 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [7] Aligning everyday life priorities with people's self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system
    Blickem, Christian
    Kennedy, Anne
    Jariwala, Praksha
    Morris, Rebecca
    Bowen, Robert
    Vassilev, Ivaylo
    Brooks, Helen
    Blakeman, Tom
    Rogers, Anne
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [8] Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
    Cane, James
    O'Connor, Denise
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [9] Carlebach Sarit, 2009, Br J Nurs, V18, P672
  • [10] Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Legare, France
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Edwards, Adrian
    May, Carl
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (1)