Factor structure and validity of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in Swedish translation

被引:66
作者
Alfonsson, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wallin, E.
Maathz, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Ctr Psychiat Res, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Hlth Care Serv, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
screening; anxiety; depression; stress; distress; psychometric; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; LARGE NONCLINICAL SAMPLE; PRIMARY-CARE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; NORMATIVE DATA; PERCEIVED STRESS; IDENTIFYING DEPRESSION; CLINICAL-SAMPLES; DASS-21; VERSION;
D O I
10.1111/jpm.12363
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction There is a constant need for theoretically sound and valid self-report instruments for measuring psychological distress. Previous studies have shown that the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) is theoretically sound, but there have been some inconsistent results regarding its factor structure. Aims The aim of the present study was to investigate and elucidate the factor structure and convergent validity of the DASS-21. Methods A total of 624 participants recruited from student, primary care and psychotherapy populations. The factor structure of the DASS-21 was assessed by confirmatory factor analyses and the convergent validity by investigating its unique correlations with other psychiatric instruments. Results A bifactor structure with depression, anxiety, stress and a general factor provided the best fit indices for the DASS-21. The convergent validity was adequate for the Depression and Anxiety subscales but more ambiguous for the Stress subscale. Discussion The present study overall supports the validity and factor structure of the DASS-21. Implications for practice The DASS-21 can be used to measure symptoms of depression and anxiety as well as overall distress. It can be useful for mental health nurses, and other first-line psychiatric professionals, in need of a short, feasible and valid instrument in everyday care
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 162
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Akin A., 2007, Educ Sci Theory Pract, V7, P260
[2]  
Alfonsson Sven, 2015, Internet Interventions, V2, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.invent.2015.07.005
[3]   Interformat Reliability of Digital Psychiatric Self-Report Questionnaires: A Systematic Review [J].
Alfonsson, Sven ;
Maathz, Pernilla ;
Hursti, Timo .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (12) :86-97
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, RES INSTRUM
[5]   Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample [J].
Antony, MM ;
Bieling, PJ ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW ;
Swinson, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 10 (02) :176-181
[6]   The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples [J].
Bottesi, Gioia ;
Ghisi, Marta ;
Altoe, Gianmarco ;
Conforti, Erica ;
Melli, Gabriele ;
Sica, Claudio .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 60 :170-181
[7]   Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples [J].
Brown, TA ;
Chorpita, BF ;
Korotitsch, W ;
Barlow, DH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (01) :79-89
[8]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[9]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales in depressed and anxious patients [J].
Clara, IP ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 23 (01) :61-67
[10]   TRIPARTITE MODEL OF ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION - PSYCHOMETRIC EVIDENCE AND TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
CLARK, LA ;
WATSON, D .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 100 (03) :316-336