Language and motor cortex response to comprehending accidental and intentional action sentences

被引:11
作者
Kana, Rajesh K. [1 ]
Ammons, Carla J. [1 ]
Doss, Constance F. [1 ]
Waite, Megan E. [1 ]
Kana, Bhumika [2 ]
Herringshaw, Abbey J. [1 ]
Hoef, Lawrence Ver [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Neurol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
fMRI; Accidental action; Intentional action; Sentence comprehension; Intentionality bias; Embodied cognition; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; BRAIN; SYSTEM; FMRI; PERSPECTIVE; MECHANISMS; AMYGDALA; NETWORK; MIRROR; WORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Understanding the meaning of others' actions involves mentally simulating those actions by oneself. Embodied theories of language espouse a prominent role for motor simulation in reading comprehension, especially when words, sentences, or narratives portray everyday actions. Inherent in these actions is the level of agency of the actor. Motor cortex activity in response to processing action verbs has been relatively well-established. What has been less explored, however, are: (1) the neural bases of determining whether an action is intentional or accidental (agency); and (2) whether agency influences level of motor simulation. This functional MRI study investigated how language and motor areas of the brain respond to sentences depicting intentional versus accidental action. 25 healthy adults read a series of sentences in the MRI scanner and determined whether the actions described were accidental or intentional. The main results include: (1) left hemisphere language areas (left inferior frontal gyrus, LIFG; left superior temporal gyrus, LSTG), premotor cortex (PM), and presupplementary motor area (pSMA) were strongly activated by both sentence types; (2) processing accidental action, relative to intentional action, elicited greater activity in LIFG, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), and left amygdala; no statistically significant activity was found in the opposite contrast; and (3) greater percent signal change was observed in LIFG while processing accidental action and in right precentral gyrus for intentional action. The results of this study support language and motor region involvement in action sentence comprehension in accordance with embodiment theories. Additionally, it provides new insight into the linguistic, integrative, and emotional demands of comprehending accidental action, its underlying neural circuitry, and its relationship to intentionality bias: the predisposition to ascribe purpose to action. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 164
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions [J].
Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa ;
Wilson, Stephen M. ;
Rizzolatti, Giacomo ;
Iacoboni, Marco .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (18) :1818-1823
[2]   The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
Wheelwright, S .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2004, 34 (02) :163-175
[3]   Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems [J].
Barsalou, LW ;
Simmons, WK ;
Barbey, AK ;
Wilson, CD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (02) :84-91
[4]   Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs [J].
Bedny, Marina ;
Caramazza, Alfonso .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 1224 :81-95
[5]   Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[6]   Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study [J].
Buccino, G ;
Riggio, L ;
Melli, G ;
Binkofski, F ;
Gallese, V ;
Rizzolatti, G .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 24 (03) :355-363
[7]   21/2-year-old children use animacy and syntax to learn a new noun [J].
Childers, JB ;
Echols, CH .
INFANCY, 2004, 5 (01) :109-125
[8]   A systematic review and quantitative appraisal of fMRI studies of verbal fluency: Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus [J].
Costafreda, Sergi G. ;
Fu, Cynthia H. Y. ;
Lee, Lucy ;
Everitt, Brian ;
Brammer, Michael J. ;
David, Anthony S. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2006, 27 (10) :799-810
[9]   AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages [J].
Cox, RW .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (03) :162-173
[10]   The amygdala: vigilance and emotion [J].
Davis, M ;
Whalen, PJ .
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 6 (01) :13-34