PERFORMANCE, EFFICIENCY AND EMISSIONS EVALUATION OF GASOLINE PORT-FUEL INJECTION, NATURAL GAS DIRECT INJECTION AND BLENDED OPERATION

被引:0
|
作者
Pamminger, Michael [1 ]
Wallner, Thomas [1 ]
Sevik, James [1 ]
Scarcelli, Riccardo [1 ]
Hall, Carrie [2 ]
Wooldridge, Steven [3 ]
Boyer, Brad [3 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[2] IIT, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[3] Ford Motor Co, Dearborn, MI 48121 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The need to further reduce fuel consumption and decrease the output of emissions - in order to be within future emissions legislation - is still an ongoing effort for the development of internal combustion engines. Natural gas is a fossil fuel which is comprised mostly of methane and makes it very attractive for use in internal combustion engines because of its higher knock resistance and higher molar hydrogen-to-carbon ratio compared to gasoline. The current paper compares the combustion and emissions behavior of the test engine being operated on either a representative U.S. market gasoline or natural gas. Moreover, specific in-cylinder blend ratios with gasoline and natural gas were also investigated at part-load and wide open throttle conditions. The dilution tolerance for part-load operation was investigated by adding cooled exhaust gas recirculation. The engine used for these investigations was a single cylinder research engine for light duty application which is equipped with two separate fuel systems. Gasoline was injected into the intake port; natural gas was injected directly into the cylinder to overcome the power density loss usually connected with port fuel injection of natural gas. Injecting natural gas directly into the cylinder reduced both ignition delay and combustion duration of the combustion process compared to the injection of gasoline into the intake port. Injecting natural gas and gasoline simultaneously resulted in a higher dilution tolerance compared to operation on one of the fuels alone. Significantly higher net indicated mean effective pressure and indicated thermal efficiency were achieved when natural gas was directly injected after intake valve closing at wide open throttle, compared to an injection while the intake valves were still open. In general it was shown that the blend ratio and the start of injection need to be varied depending on load and dilution level in order to operate the engine with the highest efficiency or highest load.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance, Efficiency and Emissions Assessment of Natural Gas Direct Injection compared to Gasoline and Natural Gas Port-Fuel Injection in an Automotive Engine
    Sevik, James
    Pamminger, Michael
    Wallner, Thomas
    Scarcelli, Riccardo
    Reese, Ronald
    Iqbal, Asim
    Boyer, Brad
    Wooldridge, Steven
    Hall, Carrie
    Miers, Scott
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2016, 9 (02) : 1130 - 1142
  • [2] Experimental Study of Effect of Injection Timing on Port Fuel Injection Gasoline, Port Fuel Injection Compressed Natural Gas, and Direct Injection Compressed Natural Gas Engine Performance, Combustion, and Emissions Characteristics
    Sahoo, Sridhar
    Srivastava, Dhananjay Kumar
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (06):
  • [3] Emissions results from port injection and direct injection bi-fuel (gasoline and compressed natural gas) engines
    Durell, E
    Law, D
    Allen, J
    Heath, J
    Hargrave, G
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 21ST CENTURY EMISSIONS TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 2001 (02): : 113 - 119
  • [4] Investigation on Performance and Emissions of Ethanol Direct Injection Plus Gasoline Port Injection Engine
    Kang R.
    Feng D.
    Wei H.
    Hua J.
    Zhou L.
    Neiranji Xuebao/Transactions of CSICE (Chinese Society for Internal Combustion Engines), 2019, 37 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [5] MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND EVALUATION OF FUEL INJECTION PRESSURE EFFECTS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EMISSIONS OF GASOLINE DIRECT INJECTION ENGINE
    Yousif, Omar M.
    Mashkour, Mahmoud A.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, : 255 - 274
  • [6] Comparison between gasoline direct injection and compressed natural gas port fuel injection under maximum load condition
    Lee, Jeongwoo
    Park, Cheolwoong
    Bae, Jongwon
    Kim, Yongrae
    Lee, Sunyoup
    Kim, Changgi
    ENERGY, 2020, 197
  • [7] Comparison between gasoline direct injection and compressed natural gas port fuel injection under maximum load condition
    Lee, Jeongwoo
    Park, Cheolwoong
    Bae, Jongwon
    Kim, Yongrae
    Lee, Sunyoup
    Kim, Changgi
    Energy, 2021, 197
  • [8] Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
    Zhang, Jie
    Liggio, John
    Chan, Tak W.
    Huang, Lin
    Brook, Jeffrey R.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (06)
  • [9] VOC species emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) and port fuel injection (PFI) vehicles combusting different gasoline
    Yu, Wenhan
    Li, Jiachen
    Hao, Chunxiao
    Ge, Yunshan
    Wang, Xin
    Zhang, Mengzhu
    Wang, Yachao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 954
  • [10] A comparison of fuel system deposits in gasoline direct injection and port fuel injection vehicles
    Arters, DC
    Bardasz, E
    Schiferl, E
    Marko, E
    Macduff, M
    INTERFACES '99: NEXT CENTURY CHALLENGES FOR PRODUCTION AND USE OF FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 213 - 225