The Role of Performance Feedback on the Self-Efficacy-Performance Relationship

被引:37
|
作者
Beattie, Stuart [1 ]
Woodman, Tim [1 ]
Fakehy, Mohammed [2 ]
Dempsey, Chelsey [1 ]
机构
[1] Bangor Univ, Inst Psychol Elite Performance, Sch Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, Bangor LL57 2PZ, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Sport Sci & Phys Act, Dept Biomech & Motor Behav, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
关键词
self-efficacy; feedback; negative; positive; moderation; METAANALYSIS; BELIEFS; CHOICE; SPORT; TASK;
D O I
10.1037/spy0000051
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We report 3 studies that explore the moderating role of performance feedback on the within-person relationship between self-efficacy and performance. In Study 1, we provided participants with either very little feedback (current trial performance) or a wider range of previous performance markers (baseline performance and current trial performance) before making efficacy judgments. In Study 2, we refined the selfefficacy measure by providing participants with more detailed feedback regarding their past performance. In Study 3, we applied the methodology from Studies 1 and 2 to a task in which negative self-efficacy effects have been prevalent (i.e., golf putting). Results revealed that performance feedback moderated the self-efficacy-performance relationship. When we provided participants with minimal performance feedback, their self-efficacy was negatively related to subsequent performance; when we provided more detailed feedback, self-efficacy was positively related to subsequent performance. Studies 2 and 3 further confirmed these findings. Results across studies confirm that feedback is an important moderator of the self-efficacy-performance relationship, which can shed light on the equivocal findings to date.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamics in the self-efficacy-performance relationship following failure
    Hardy, Jay H., III
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 71 : 151 - 158
  • [2] The self-efficacy-performance link in maximum strength performance
    Wells, Christie M.
    Collins, David
    Hale, Bruce D.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 1993, 11 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [3] Accuracy of University students' skill-specific self-efficacy and self-efficacy-performance in gymnastics relationship
    Milosis, Dimitrios C.
    Siatras, Theophanis A.
    Proios, Miltiadis K.
    Proios, Michael K.
    Christoulas, Kosmas I.
    Papaioannou, Athanasios G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 49 (05) : 429 - 447
  • [4] The Moderating Role of Narcissism on the Reciprocal Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Performance
    Beattie, Stuart
    Dempsey, Chelsey
    Roberts, Ross
    Woodman, Tim
    Cooke, Andrew
    SPORT EXERCISE AND PERFORMANCE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 6 (02) : 199 - 214
  • [5] Framing of feedback impacts student's satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance
    van de Ridder, J. M. Monica
    Peters, Claudia M. M.
    Stokking, Karel M.
    de Ru, J. Alexander
    ten Cate, Olle Th J.
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 20 (03) : 803 - 816
  • [6] The Moderating Effects of Performance Ambiguity on the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Performance
    Schmidt, Aaron M.
    DeShon, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (03) : 572 - 581
  • [7] Relationship between parenting styles and academic performance of adolescents: mediating role of self-efficacy
    Masud, Hamid
    Ahmad, Muhammad Shakil
    Jan, Farzand Ali
    Jamil, Ahmad
    ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 2016, 17 (01) : 121 - 131
  • [8] Examining the moderating effects of time on task and task complexity on the within person self-efficacy and performance relationship
    Beattie, Stuart
    Fakehy, Mohammed
    Woodman, Tim
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2014, 15 (06) : 605 - 610
  • [9] Discrepancy between performance and feedback affects mathematics student teachers' self-efficacy but not their self-assessment accuracy
    Ernst, Helen M.
    Prinz-Weiss, Anja
    Wittwer, Joerg
    Voss, Thamar
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [10] Framing of feedback impacts student’s satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance
    J. M. Monica van de Ridder
    Claudia M. M. Peters
    Karel M. Stokking
    J. Alexander de Ru
    Olle Th. J. ten Cate
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2015, 20 : 803 - 816