Pros and Cons of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

被引:0
作者
Zeimet, Alain G. [1 ]
Reimer, Daniel [1 ]
Radl, Alice C. [1 ]
Reinthaller, Alexander [2 ]
Schauer, Christian [3 ]
Petru, Edgar [4 ]
Concin, Nicole [1 ]
Braun, Stephan [1 ]
Marth, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Krankenhaus Barmherzigen Bruder, Dept Gynecol, Graz, Austria
[4] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Graz, Austria
关键词
Ovarian cancer; intraperitoneal chemotherapy; platinum; taxane; review; PHASE-III TRIAL; INTRAVENOUS CARBOPLATIN; PACLITAXEL CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CISPLATIN; CARCINOMA; GEMCITABINE; COMBINATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Development of the pros and cons of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer based on the most prominent data published on the evolution of IP chemotherapy and on experience with this therapeutic strategy in clinical routine. The literature published on IP chemotherapy in ovarian cancer between 1970 and 2008 was identified systematically by computer-based searches in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Furthermore, a preliminary analysis of data recorded during an observational nationwide multicenter study of the Austrian AGO on IP-IV chemotherapy using the GOG-172 treatment regimen was performed. The literature review unequivocally revealed a significantly greater toxicity for IP than for intravenous (IV) cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, according to a Cochrane meta-analysis, IP-IV administration of chemotherapy is associated with a 21.6% decrease in the risk for death. In agreement with earlier reports, the most frequently mentioned side-effects in the Austria-wide observational study were long-lasting neurotoxicity, abdominal pain, fatigue, gastrointestinal and metabolic toxicities, and catheter-related complications. Most of these toxicities were identified as mirroring the toxicity profile of high-dose IV cisplatin (>= 100 mg/m(2)). In some patients, the classic IP-IV regimen with cisplatin/paclitaxel was changed to an alternative schedule comprising carboplatin AUC 5 (d1) and weekly paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) (d1, 8, 15) completely administered via the IP route. This treatment was better tolerated and quality of life was significantly less compromised. However, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the limiting side-effects of this IP regimen. In cases where optimal cytoreduction with residual disease <= 1 cm was achieved during primary surgery and disease was confined to the peritoneal cavity, IP chemotherapy should be given serious consideration, even at the expense of significantly increased, but manageable toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:2803 / 2808
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Liu, PY ;
Hannigan, EV ;
OToole, R ;
Williams, SD ;
Young, JA ;
Franklin, EW ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Malviya, VK ;
DuBeshter, B ;
Adelson, MD ;
Hoskins, WJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) :1950-1955
[2]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[3]   A phase I study of intraperitoneal topotecan in combination with intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Bos, AME ;
De Vos, FYFL ;
de Vries, EGE ;
Beijnen, JH ;
Rosing, H ;
Mourits, MJE ;
van der Zee, AGJ ;
Gietema, JA ;
Willemse, PHB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (04) :539-548
[4]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Santillan, Antonio ;
Salani, Ritu ;
Diaz-Montes, Teresa P. ;
Giuntoli, Robert L., II ;
Meisner, Benjamin C. ;
Armstrong, Deborah K. ;
Frick, Kevin D. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 106 (03) :476-481
[5]   A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer [J].
du Bois, A ;
Lück, HJ ;
Meier, W ;
Adams, HP ;
Möbus, V ;
Costa, S ;
Bauknecht, T ;
Richter, B ;
Warm, M ;
Schröder, W ;
Olbricht, S ;
Nitz, U ;
Jackisch, C ;
Emons, G ;
Wagner, U ;
Kuhn, W ;
Pfisterer, J .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (17) :1320-1330
[6]   Preliminary toxicity analysis of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube [J].
Fujiwara, K ;
Suzuki, S ;
Ishikawa, H ;
Oda, T ;
Aotani, E ;
Kohno, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 (03) :426-431
[7]   First-line intraperitoneal carboplatin-based chemotherapy for 165 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma: results of long-term follow-up [J].
Fujiwara, K ;
Sakuragi, N ;
Suzuki, S ;
Yoshida, N ;
Maehata, K ;
Nishiya, M ;
Koshida, T ;
Sawai, H ;
Aotani, E ;
Kohno, I .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (03) :637-643
[8]   Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature [J].
Gadducci, A. ;
Conte, P. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (05) :943-953
[9]   Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study [J].
Havrilesky, Laura J. ;
Secord, Angeles Alvarez ;
Darcy, Kathleen M. ;
Armstrong, Deborah K. ;
Kulasingam, Shalini .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (25) :4144-4150
[10]  
*IARC, 2002, GLOBOCAN CANC INC MO