Vaccination as a tool to combat introductions of notifiable avian influenza viruses in Europe, 2000 to 2006

被引:24
|
作者
Capua, I. [1 ]
Schmitz, A. [2 ]
Jestin, V. [2 ]
Koch, G. [3 ]
Marangon, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Venezie, OIE FAO Reference Lab Newcastle Dis & Avian Influ, I-35020 Padua, Italy
[2] AFSSA, Avian & Rabbit Virol Immunol & Parasitol Unit, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Cent Vet Inst, NL-8222 RA Lelystad, Netherlands
来源
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES | 2009年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
Avian influenza; Control; Epidemiology; Europe; Vaccination; PROTECTIVE EFFICACY; CHICKENS; INFECTION; EPIDEMIC; POULTRY; VALIDATION; VETERINARY; STRATEGY; TURKEYS; FARMS;
D O I
10.20506/rst.28.1.1861
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
In late 2000, Italy was the first country of the European Union (EU) to implement an emergency vaccination programme against notifiable avian influenza. Vaccination with a conventional vaccine containing a seed strain with a different neuraminidase subtype from that of the field virus was used to complement biosecurity and restriction measures as part of an overall eradication strategy. This vaccination technique, in line with the Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals system (DIVA), was applied several times until March 2008. This strategy enabled the identification of field exposed flocks and ultimately the eradication of low pathogenic H7N1, H7N3 and H5N2 infections. Italy was also the first country to implement a bivalent H5/H7 prophylactic vaccination programme of defined poultry populations, which was discontinued in December 2006. Following the incursion of highly pathogenic H5N1 into Europe, in 2005 and 2006, two other EU Member States, namely France and the Netherlands, implemented preventive vaccination programmes in 2006 but they targeted selected poultry populations different from those targeted in Italy and were implemented for short periods of time. Data generated during six years of experience with vaccination against avian influenza in Italy indicate that it is a useful tool to limit secondary spread and possibly prevent the introduction of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses in a susceptible population. The experience of France and the Netherlands provides data on vaccination of ducks and hobby poultry respectively and monitoring programmes associated with vaccination and difficulties related to their application. The advantages and disadvantages of vaccination need to be considered in the decision-making process, including the financial aspects of vaccination.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 259
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of vaccination to combat multiple introductions of Notifiable Avian Influenza viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes between 2000 and 2006 in Italy
    Capua, Ilaria
    Marangon, Stefano
    VACCINE, 2007, 25 (27) : 4987 - 4995
  • [2] Vaccination for notifiable avian influenza in poultry
    Capua, I.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2007, 26 (01): : 217 - 227
  • [3] The challenge of controlling notifiable avian influenza by means of vaccination
    Capua, Ilaria
    Marangon, Stefano
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2007, 51 (01) : 317 - 322
  • [4] Development and Application of a Vaccination Planning Tool for Avian Influenza
    Castellan, David M.
    Hinrichs, Jan
    Fusheng, Guo
    Sawitri, Elly
    Do Huu Dung
    Martin, Vincent
    McGrane, James
    Bandyopadhayay, Santanu
    Ken Inui
    Yamage, Mat
    Ahmed, Garba Maina
    Macfarlane, Laura
    Williams, Tony
    Dissanayake, Ravi
    Akram, Muhammad
    Kalpravidh, Wantanee
    Gopinath, C. Y.
    Morzaria, Subhash
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2014, 58 (03) : 437 - 452
  • [5] Genetic characterization of avian influenza viruses isolated in Israel during 2000–2006
    Natalia Golender
    Alexander Panshin
    Caroline Banet-Noach
    Sagit Nagar
    Shimon Pokamunski
    Michael Pirak
    Yevgeny Tendler
    Irit Davidson
    Maricarmen García
    Shimon Perk
    Virus Genes, 2008, 37 : 289 - 297
  • [6] Assessment of national strategies for control of high-pathogenicity avian influenza and low-pathogenicity notifiable avian influenza in poultry, with emphasis on vaccines and vaccination
    Swayne, D. E.
    Pavade, G.
    Hamilton, K.
    Vallat, B.
    Miyagishima, K.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2011, 30 (03): : 839 - 870
  • [7] Genetic characterization of avian influenza viruses isolated in Israel during 2000-2006
    Golender, Natalia
    Panshin, Alexander
    Banet-Noach, Caroline
    Nagar, Sagit
    Pokamunski, Shimon
    Pirak, Michael
    Tendler, Yevgeny
    Davidson, Irit
    Garcia, Maricarmen
    Perk, Shimon
    VIRUS GENES, 2008, 37 (03) : 289 - 297
  • [8] Avian influenza viruses in Minnesota ducks during 1998-2000
    Hanson, BA
    Stallknecht, DE
    Swayne, DE
    Lewis, LA
    Senne, DA
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2003, 47 : 867 - 871
  • [9] Chasing Notifiable Avian Influenza in Domestic Poultry: A Case Report of Low-Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5 Viruses in Two Belgian Holdings
    Marche, S.
    Van Borm, S.
    Lambrecht, B.
    Houdart, P.
    van den Berg, T.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2014, 61 (06) : 526 - 536
  • [10] Evaluation of vaccination strategies to control an avian influenza outbreak in French poultry production networks using EVACS tool
    Hautefeuille, Claire
    Azzouguen, Billal
    Mouchel, Simon
    Dauphin, Gwenaelle
    Peyre, Marisa
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 184