Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction

被引:150
作者
Zhou, Qingji [1 ]
Thai, Vinh V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Maritime Inst NTU, Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Business IT & Logist, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
FMEA; Fuzzy theory; Grey theory; Equipment failure mode; FRPN; RISK; INFERENCE; LOGIC; FMEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been extensively used for examining potential failures in many industries. Unlike the traditional FMEA, the risk factors of occurrence (0), severity (S) and detection (D) of each failure mode are evaluated by linguistic terms and fuzzy ratings in this research, and their relative weights are considered, which make the results more useful and practical. Both grey theory and fuzzy theory are applied in FMEA, in which fuzzy set theory is used to calculate the fuzzy risk priority numbers (FRPNs), and grey theory is applied to calculate the grey relational coefficient. The rankings of the failure modes are both determined by FRPNs and the grey theory. An example of oil tanker equipment failure is provided, and the results show that the evaluation of failure modes by both fuzzy theory and grey theory are quite similar. The practical application of fuzzy and grey theories proposed in this paper helps to enhance the reliability of the prediction, and the predicted ranking of equipment failure can be used for better decision-making concerning inspection and maintenance, which in turn will make tanker shipping more safe and reliable. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 79
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP [J].
Abdelgawad, Mohamed ;
Fayek, Aminah Robinson .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (09) :1028-1036
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, INT J QUALITY RELIAB
[3]  
Ben-Daya M., 1996, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719610108297
[4]   APPLICATION OF FUZZY-LOGIC TO RELIABILITY ENGINEERING [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1995, 83 (03) :435-449
[5]   An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis [J].
Bowles, JB .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :380-386
[6]  
Braglia M., 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P503, DOI 10.1108/02656710310468687
[7]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [J].
Braglia, M ;
Frosolini, M ;
Montanari, R .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (05) :425-443
[8]  
Chang I.C., 1996, MILITARY NEW TECHNOL, V94
[9]   A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities [J].
Chen, CB ;
Klein, CM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1997, 27 (01) :26-35
[10]   Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Chan, Allen ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 36 (7-8) :633-649