Equivalence of canonical matching models

被引:2
作者
Kennes, John [1 ,4 ]
le Maire, Daniel [2 ]
Roelsgaard, Sebastian T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Econ, Oster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1535 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[3] Princeton Univ, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dale T Mortensen Ctr, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
Directed search; Price dispersion; Competing auctions; Poisson distribution; MECHANISM DESIGN; EQUILIBRIUM; ASSIGNMENT; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2020.08.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper offers expected revenue and pricing equivalence results for canonical matching models. The equivalence of these models is centered on the assumption that there are large numbers of buyers and sellers, and the contact decisions of buyers to sellers are made independently. Therefore, the distribution of buyers to sellers is approximated by the Poisson distribution. The list of canonical matching models includes the models developed by Burdett and Judd (1983), Shimer (2005), and McAfee (1993). In the Burdett and Judd model, buyers post prices and the equilibrium features price dispersion because identical buyers play mixed strategies. In the Shimer model, sellers post a vector of prices corresponding to different buyer types. In equilibrium, all identical buyers pay the same price. In the McAfee model, equilibrium pricing is determined by simple second price auctions. McAfee's model also features price dispersion because the number of bidders at each auction is stochastic. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 182
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal dynamic matching
    Baccara, Mariagiovanna
    Lee, SangMok
    Yariv, Leeat
    THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 15 (03) : 1221 - 1278
  • [22] Models for cellular manufacturing systems design: matching processing requirements and operator capabilities
    Bhatnagar, R.
    Saddikuti, V.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2010, 61 (05) : 827 - 839
  • [23] New Ways to Evaluate Goodness of Fit: A Note on Using Equivalence Testing to Assess Structural Equation Models
    Marcoulides, Katerina M.
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 24 (01) : 148 - 153
  • [24] Pricing and investments in matching markets
    Mailath, George J.
    Postlewaite, Andrew
    Samuelson, Larry
    THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 8 (02) : 535 - 590
  • [25] Assortative Matching With Large Firms
    Eeckhout, Jan
    Kircher, Philipp
    ECONOMETRICA, 2018, 86 (01) : 85 - 132
  • [26] Managing Congestion in Matching Markets
    Arnosti, Nick
    Johari, Ramesh
    Kanoria, Yash
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 23 (03) : 620 - 636
  • [27] Stock-flow matching
    Ebrahimy, Ehsan
    Shimer, Robert
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2010, 145 (04) : 1325 - 1353
  • [28] Partial Matching of Large Scale Process Plant Models Using Random Walk on Graphs
    Mao, Weiwei
    Lu, Zhuheng
    Dai, Yuewei
    Li, Weiqing
    Su, Zhiyong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 201109 - 201119
  • [29] On the inefficiency of matching models of unemployment with heterogeneous workers and jobs when firms rank their applicants
    Gavrel, Frederic
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (08) : 1746 - 1758
  • [30] Canonical Typicality for Other Ensembles than Micro-canonical
    Teufel, Stefan
    Tumulka, Roderich
    Vogel, Cornelia
    ANNALES HENRI POINCARE, 2025, 26 (04): : 1477 - 1518