Organizational learning with forgetting: Reconsidering the exploration-exploitation tradeoff

被引:33
作者
Miller, Kent D. [1 ]
Martignoni, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Svizzera Italiana, Management, Lugano, Switzerland
关键词
agent-based model; diversity; exploration-exploitation; forgetting; memory; organizational learning; NETWORK STRUCTURE; AMBIDEXTERITY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; RATIONALITY; ANTECEDENTS; ROUTINES; VARIETY; PRODUCT; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1177/1476127015608337
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prior exploration-exploitation models of organizational learning generally neglect forgetting. This study models organizational learning with forgetting and derives some novel implications. Most noteworthy, our findings point out limits to the contention that promoting rapid learning undermines long-run knowledge. Slower learning is not always better. When agents are subject to forgetting, raising the rate of interpersonal learning often enhances the diversity of beliefs within an organization, as well as the number and range of aspects of the environment that organizational members come to know. The rate of learning that maximizes organizational knowledge or diversity varies with the rate of forgetting. Organizations need not sacrifice diversity as they gain knowledge. Analyses of our model indicate that knowledge and diversity are positively correlated across organizations. Implications of forgetting redirect theorists, empirical researchers, and managers toward alternatives to some conclusions from prior exploration-exploitation modeling studies.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 72
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations [J].
Akgun, Ali E. ;
Byrne, John C. ;
Lynn, Gary S. ;
Keskin, Halit .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 20 (06) :794-812
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1947, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
[3]  
Argote L., 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01970.x
[4]  
Arrow H., 2000, Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation
[5]   CLARIFYING THE DISTINCTIVE CONTRIBUTION OF AMBIDEXTERITY TO THE FIELD OF ORGANIZATION STUDIES [J].
Birkinshaw, Julian ;
Gupta, Kamini .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (04) :287-298
[6]   Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation [J].
Blackler, F .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1995, 16 (06) :1021-1046
[7]  
Blaschke S., 2006, Soziale Systeme, V12, P99
[8]   Corporate strategy: an agent-based approach [J].
Caldart, Adrian Atilio ;
Ricart, Joan E. .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 4 (02) :107-120
[9]   Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Gedajlovic, Eric ;
Zhang, Hongping .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :781-796
[10]   ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND PERSONNEL TURNOVER [J].
CARLEY, K .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (01) :20-46