Age Differences in Item Selection Behaviors and Subsequent Memory for New Foreign Language Vocabulary: Evidence for a Region of Proximal Learning Heuristic

被引:4
作者
Hertzog, Christopher [1 ]
Price, Jodi [2 ]
Murray, Rory [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Psychol, 654 Cherry St Northwest, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Huntsville, Sch Psychol, Huntsville, AL USA
关键词
self-regulated learning; associative learning; metacognition; aging; OLDER-ADULTS; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; MULTILEVEL MODELS; TIME ALLOCATION; SELF-EFFICACY; YOUNGER; JUDGMENTS; INFORMATION; METAMEMORY; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1037/pag0000574
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
We examined younger and older adults' item selection behaviors to assess heuristics for self-regulating learning of English meanings of Chinese characters varying widely in figural complexity. Two study-test trials were used to assess whether (a) item selection behaviors on the first study opportunity would show evidence for a difficulty-based heuristic as posited by Metcalfe's (2002) region of proximal learning (RPL) theory, or alternatively, influences of habitual English-language reading order (i.e. left-to-right, top-to-bottom); (b) whether second-trial selection behaviors were better predicted by RPL or by the discrepancy reduction model (DRM; Dunlosky & Hertzog, 1998); and (c) whether Trial 1 test performance would alter Trial 2 study in a manner predicted by RPL. DRM stipulates people select any item for study at Trial 2 that was not previously recalled. RPL states that people study only items they believe they can learn, avoiding complex items above their subjective RR. Stimuli were 36 Chinese-English vocabulary pairs randomly presented in six 2 x 3-element grids. Both habitual reading order and stimulus complexity at Trial 1 affected order of study, with participants of both age groups manifesting a preference to study less complex characters. However, older adults showed larger effects of stimulus complexity whereas younger adults had larger effects of habitual reading order. At Trial 2, older adults showed a greater tendency to avoid studying the most complex Chinese characters, consistent with RPL, which contributed to their lower rates of vocabulary acquisition. Older adults' more conservative RPLs appeared to constrain their degree of self-regulated learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1072
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [11] Cohen J., Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences, V2nd ed.
  • [12] Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning
    Dunlosky, J
    Hertzog, C
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1997, 52 (04): : P178 - P186
  • [13] Training monitoring skills improves older adults' self-paced associative learning
    Dunlosky, J
    Kubat-Silman, AK
    Hertzog, C
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2003, 18 (02) : 340 - 345
  • [14] Dunlosky J, 1998, EDUC PSYCHO, P249
  • [15] Dunlosky J., 2009, METACOGNITION
  • [16] The Influence of Agenda-Based and Habitual Processes on Item Selection During Study
    Dunlosky, John
    Ariel, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (04) : 899 - 912
  • [17] Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue
    Enders, Craig K.
    Tofighi, Davood
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (02) : 121 - 138
  • [18] Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test
    Finn, Bridgid
    Metcalfe, Janet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 58 (01) : 19 - 34
  • [19] Study Time Allocation Deficit of Older Adults: The Role of Environmental Support at Encoding?
    Froger, Charlotte
    Bouazzaoui, Badiaa
    Isingrini, Michel
    Taconnat, Laurence
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (03) : 577 - 588
  • [20] Younger and Older Adults' Associative Memory for Social Information: The Role of Information Importance
    Hargis, Mary B.
    Castel, Alan D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2017, 32 (04) : 325 - 330