EVALUATING DIALOGUE STRATEGIES IN MULTIMODAL DIALOGUE SYSTEMS

Previous research suggests that multimodal dialogue systems providing both speech and pen input, and outputting a combination of spoken language and graphics, are more robust than unimodal systems based on speech or graphics alone (Andre, 2002; Oviatt, 1999). Such systems are complex to build and significant research and evaluation effort must typically be expended to generate well-tuned modules for each system component. This chapter describes experiments utilising two complementary evaluation methods that can expedite the design process: (1) a Wizard-of-Oz data collection and evaluation using a novel Wizard tool we developed; and (2) an Overhearer evaluation experiment utilising logged interactions with the real system. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods and summarise how these two experiments have informed our research on dialogue management and response generation for the multimodal dialogue system MATCH.