Intimate partner violence against women with intellectual disability: A relational framework for inclusive, trauma-informed social services

被引:13
作者
McConnell, David [1 ]
Phelan, Shanon K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Occupat Therapy, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Occupat Therapy, Fac Hlth, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
intimate partner violence; learning disability; pragmatic inquiry; relational autonomy; trauma-informed; women with intellectual disability; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; RISK; PEOPLE; EXPERIENCES; PREVALENCE; SUPPORT; HEALTH; ASSOCIATION; AUTONOMY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1111/hsc.13932
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Women with intellectual disability experience intimate partner violence at higher rates and tend to remain in abusive relationships longer than non-disabled women. The purpose of this inquiry was to generate a preliminary set of principles and delineate domains of support as a general guide for social service workers supporting women with intellectual disability through the difficult, often stop-start process of ending an abusive relationship and creating a desired future. Taking a pragmatic inquiry approach, guiding principles and domains of support were generated through a triangulated engagement with relational theory, relevant published research, and original data gathered through interviews with five experienced social service workers. The results comprise a relational framework for inclusive, trauma-informed services aimed at fostering the relational autonomy of women with intellectual disability. Enacting relational principles of reflexivity, recognition, solidarity and safety, social service workers can support women with intellectual disability with safety planning, securing basic life needs, strengthening social relationships, acquiring new skills and nurturing self-affective attitudes of self-respect, self-efficacy and self-esteem.
引用
收藏
页码:E5156 / E5166
页数:11
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Anderson J., 2014, Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, P134
[2]  
Anderson Joel., 2005, AUTONOMY CHALLENGES, P127, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511610325.008
[3]  
Ballan M S., 2017, Advances in Social Work, V18, P131, DOI DOI 10.18060/21308
[4]   Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Beydoun, Hind A. ;
Beydoun, May A. ;
Kaufman, Jay S. ;
Lo, Bruce ;
Zonderman, Alan B. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (06) :959-975
[5]   People with Intellectual Disabilities Negotiate Autonomy, Gender and Sexuality [J].
Bjornsdottir, Kristin ;
Stefansdottir, Astridur ;
Stefansdottir, Gudrun Valgerdur .
SEXUALITY AND DISABILITY, 2017, 35 (03) :295-311
[6]  
Bourdieu P., 1992, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology
[7]   The Prevalence and Correlates of Partner Violence Used and Experienced by Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Call to Action [J].
Bowen, Erica ;
Swift, Charlotte .
TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2019, 20 (05) :693-705
[8]  
Braudo-Bahat Y., 2017, The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, V25, P111
[9]   The association between disability and intimate partner violence in the United States [J].
Breiding, Matthew J. ;
Armour, Brian S. .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) :455-457
[10]   Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk, and explanations [J].
Brownridge, Douglas A. .
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2006, 12 (09) :805-822