Chemical Safety Assessment Using Read-Across: Assessing the Use of Novel Testing Methods to Strengthen the Evidence Base for Decision Making

被引:74
作者
Berggren, Elisabet [1 ]
Amcoff, Patric [2 ]
Benigni, Romualdo [3 ]
Blackburn, Karen [4 ]
Carney, Edward [5 ]
Cronin, Mark [6 ]
Deluyker, Hubert [7 ]
Gautier, Francoise [8 ]
Judson, Richard S. [9 ]
Kass, Georges E. N. [7 ]
Keller, Detlef [10 ]
Knight, Derek [11 ]
Lilienblum, Werner [12 ]
Mahony, Catherine [13 ]
Rusyn, Ivan [14 ]
Schultz, Terry [15 ]
Schwarz, Michael [16 ]
Schueuermann, Gerrit [17 ,18 ]
White, Andrew [19 ]
Burton, Julien [1 ]
Lostia, Alfonso M. [1 ]
Munn, Sharon [1 ]
Worth, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[2] Cosmet Europe, Brussels, Belgium
[3] OECD, Paris, France
[4] Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Dow Chem Co USA, Midland, MI 48674 USA
[6] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
[7] EFSA, Parma, Italy
[8] L Oreal, Asnieres, France
[9] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[10] Henkel AG & Co, Dusseldorf, Germany
[11] ECHA European Chem Agcy, Helsinki, Finland
[12] SCCS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[13] Procter & Gamble, Egham, Surrey, England
[14] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[15] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN USA
[16] Univ Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
[17] Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Leipzig, Germany
[18] Tech Univ Bergakademie Freiberg, Inst Organ Chem, Freiberg, Germany
[19] Unilever PLC, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
关键词
RISK-ASSESSMENT; IN-VITRO; FRAMEWORK; TOXICITY; HAZARD; UNCERTAINTY; INTEGRATION; REACTIVITY; TOXICOLOGY; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.1409342
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Safety assessment for repeated dose toxicity is one of the largest challenges in the process to replace animal testing. This is also one of the proof of concept ambitions of SEURAT-1, the largest ever European Union research initiative on alternative testing, co-funded by the European Commission and Cosmetics Europe. This review is based on the discussion and outcome of a workshop organized on initiative of the SEURAT-1 consortium joined by a group of international experts with complementary knowledge to further develop traditional read-across and include new approach data. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the suggested strategy for chemical read-across is to show how a traditional read-across based on structural similarities between source and target substance can be strengthened with additional evidence from new approach data-for example, information from in-vitro molecular screening, "-omics" assays and computational models-to reach regulatory acceptance. METHODS: We identified four read-across scenarios that cover typical human health assessment situations. For each such decision context, we suggested several chemical groups as examples to prove when read-across between group members is possible, considering both chemical and biological similarities. CONCLUSIONS: We agreed to carry out the complete read-across exercise for at least one chemical category per read-across scenario in the context of SEURAT-1, and the results of this exercise will be completed and presented by the end of the research initiative in December 2015.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1240
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT ECOTOXICOLOGY RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
Ankley, Gerald T. ;
Bennett, Richard S. ;
Erickson, Russell J. ;
Hoff, Dale J. ;
Hornung, Michael W. ;
Johnson, Rodney D. ;
Mount, David R. ;
Nichols, John W. ;
Russom, Christine L. ;
Schmieder, Patricia K. ;
Serrrano, Jose A. ;
Tietge, Joseph E. ;
Villeneuve, Daniel L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2010, 29 (03) :730-741
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUID INF REQ CHEM SA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, CONCEPTS APPL MOL SI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TOXICITY TESTING 21, DOI DOI 10.17226/11970
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook of molecular descriptors
[6]   The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study [J].
Ball, Nicholas ;
Bartels, Michael ;
Budinsky, Robert ;
Klapacz, Joanna ;
Hays, Sean ;
Kirman, Christopher ;
Patlewicz, Grace .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 68 (02) :212-221
[7]  
Berggren E, 2014, REPLACEMENT IN VIVO, V4, P86
[8]   A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty [J].
Blackburn, Karen ;
Stuard, Sharon B. .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 68 (03) :353-362
[9]   Case studies to test: A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments [J].
Blackburn, Karen ;
Bjerke, Donald ;
Daston, George ;
Felter, Susan ;
Mahony, Catherine ;
Naciff, Jorge ;
Robison, Steven ;
Wu, Shengde .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 60 (01) :120-135
[10]   IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans [J].
Boobis, Alan R. ;
Doe, John E. ;
Heinrich-Hirsch, Barbara ;
Meek, M. E. ;
Munn, Sharon ;
Ruchirawat, Mathuros ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Seed, Jennifer ;
Vickers, Carolyn .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 38 (02) :87-96