Effectiveness of radiation therapy in older women with ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:60
作者
Smith, Benjamin D.
Haffty, Bruce G.
Buchholz, Thomas A.
Smith, Grace L.
Galusha, Deron H.
Bekelman, Justin E.
Gross, Cary P.
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2006年 / 98卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj359
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: For women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), radiation therapy after conservative surgery lowers the risk of recurrence. However, emerging evidence suggests that radiation therapy confers only a marginal absolute benefit for older women with DCIS. In a cohort of older women with DCIS, we sought to determine whether radiation therapy was associated with a clinically significant benefit. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) - Medicare database from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999, we identified 3409 women aged 66 years or older treated with conservative surgery for DCIS. A proportional hazards model tested whether radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk of a combined outcome, defined as a subsequent ipsilateral in situ or invasive breast cancer reported by SEER and/or a subsequent mastectomy reported by Medicare claims. The 5-year event risk was determined for patients without and with high-risk features, which were defined as at least one of the following: age 66-69 years, tumor larger than 2.5 cm, comedo histology, and/or high grade. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk for each component of the combined outcome (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24 to 0.44). For high-risk patients, the 5-year event risk was 13.6% without radiation therapy versus 3.8% with radiation therapy (difference = 9.8%, 95% CI = 6.5 to 13.2; P < .001). For low-risk patients, the 5-year event risk was 8.2% without radiation therapy versus 1.0% with radiation therapy (difference = 7.2%, 95% CI = 3.6 to 10.9; P < .001). Among healthy women aged 66-79 years, the number needed to treat with radiation therapy to prevent one event in 5 years was 11 for high-risk patients and 15-16 for low-risk patients. Conclusion: For older women with DCIS, radiation therapy appears to confer a substantial benefit that remains meaningful even among low-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1310
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ANDERSON CA, 2002, CURRENT PROCEDURAL T
[2]  
Bach PB, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P19
[3]   Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cronin, KA ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Fryback, DG ;
Clarke, L ;
Zelen, M ;
Mandelblatt, JS ;
Yakovlev, AY ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Feuer, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1784-1792
[4]   Effects of patient selection on the applicability of results from a randomised clinical trial (EORTC 10853) investigating breast-conserving therapy for DOS [J].
Bijker, N ;
Peterse, JL ;
Fentiman, IS ;
Julien, JP ;
Hart, AAM ;
Avril, A ;
Cataliotti, L ;
Rutgers, EJT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 87 (06) :615-620
[5]   Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: Analysis of European organization for research and treatment of cancer trial 10853 [J].
Bijker, N ;
Peterse, JL ;
Duchateau, L ;
Julien, JP ;
Fentiman, IS ;
Duval, C ;
Di Palma, S ;
Simony-Lafontaine, J ;
de Mascarel, I ;
van de Vijver, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (08) :2263-2271
[6]   Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures [J].
Black, DM ;
Cummings, SR ;
Karpf, DB ;
Cauley, JA ;
Thompson, DE ;
Nevitt, MC ;
Bauer, DC ;
Genant, HK ;
Haskell, WL ;
Marcus, R ;
Ott, SM ;
Torner, JC ;
Quandt, SA ;
Reiss, TF ;
Ensrud, KE .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9041) :1535-1541
[7]  
Britton A, 1999, J Health Serv Res Policy, V4, P112
[8]  
BUCK CJ, 2002, ICD 9 CM, V1
[9]  
BUCK CJ, 2002, ICD 9 CM, V2
[10]  
BUCK CJ, 2002, ICD 9 CM, V3