Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:82
|
作者
Orhurhu, Vwaire [1 ]
Orhurhu, Mariam Salisu [2 ]
Bhatia, Anuj [3 ,4 ]
Cohen, Steven P. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Neurol & Phys Med & Rehabil, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Phys Med & Rehabil, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2019年 / 129卷 / 01期
关键词
INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CANCER PAIN; SENSITIZATION; FIBROMYALGIA; OUTCOMES; NEED;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: IV ketamine is widely used to treat patients with chronic pain, yet the long-term impact remains uncertain. We synthesized evidence from randomized control trials to investigate the effectiveness of IV ketamine infusions for pain relief in chronic conditions and to determine whether any pain classifications or treatment regimens are associated with greater benefit. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar, as well as the website from inception through December 16, 2017 for randomized control trials comparing IV ketamine to placebo infusions for chronic pain that reported outcomes for >= 48 hours after the intervention. Three authors independently screened the studies, pooled the data, and appraised risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to calculate weighted mean differences for pain scores and secondary outcomes. Our primary outcome was the lowest recorded pain score >= 48 hours after cessation of treatment. Secondary outcomes included responder rate and adverse effects. RESULTS: Among 696 studies assessed for eligibility, 7 met inclusion criteria. All studies except one were at high risk of bias. These studies randomly assigned 211 patients with neuropathic (n = 2), mixed (n = 2), and nonneuropathic (nociplastic or nociceptive) (n = 3) pain. Three studies reported significant analgesic benefit favoring ketamine, with the meta-analysis revealing a small effect up to 2 weeks after the infusion (mean difference in pain scores, -1.83 points on a 0-10 numerical rating scale; 95% CI, -2.35 to -1.31 points; P < .0001). In the 3 studies that reported responder rates, the proportion with a positive outcome was greater in the ketamine than in the placebo group (51.3% vs 19.4%; relative risk, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.10-5.40; P = .029; I-2 = 0.0%). No differences were noted based on pain classification or condition. Compared to low-dose ketamine studies and investigations that evaluated non-complex regional pain syndrome conditions, a small but nonsignificant greater reduction in pain scores was found among studies that either utilized high-dose ketamine therapy (P = .213) or enrolled complex regional pain syndrome patients (P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IV ketamine provides significant short-term analgesic benefit in patients with refractory chronic pain, with some evidence of a dose-response relationship. Larger, multicenter studies with longer follow-ups are needed to better select patients and determine the optimal treatment protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 254
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Gilron, Ian
    Rajarathinam, Manikandan
    AlAmri, Rizq
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    Thabane, Lehana
    Devereaux, Philip J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (08)
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Feng-qin
    Ge, Jian-feng
    Leng, Yu-fei
    Li, Cheng
    Chen, Bin
    Sun, Zhi-ling
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 39
  • [33] Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Zou, Zhuo-Lin
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Chen, Da-Zhi
    Zou, Tian-Tian
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (09)
  • [34] Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials in Cytopathology
    AbdullGaffar, Badr
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [35] injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Daou, Marietou
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Teng, Jennifer F. T.
    Taran, Shaurya
    Zytaruk, Nicole
    Cook, Deborah
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 71
  • [36] Nutritional management of chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wiese, Mats
    Gaertner, Simone
    Doller, Julia
    Tran, Trung Quang
    Frost, Fabian
    Bannert, Karen
    Jaster, Robert
    Berlin, Peggy
    Valentini, Luzia
    Meyer, Fatuma
    Metges, Cornelia C.
    Lamprecht, Georg
    Lerch, Markus M.
    Aghdassi, Ali A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (03) : 588 - 600
  • [37] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of ketamine in the treatment of refractory anxiety spectrum disorders
    Whittaker, Elizabeth
    Dadabayev, Alisher R.
    Joshi, Sonalee A.
    Glue, Paul
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [38] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjunctive ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy: Efficacy and tolerability
    McGirr, Alexander
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Bond, David J.
    Neufeld, Nicholas H.
    Chan, Peter Y.
    Yatham, Lakshmi N.
    Lam, Raymond W.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 62 : 23 - 30
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of ketamine as an adjuvant to regional anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiang, Jiajia
    Cao, Chunyan
    Chen, Jiayu
    Kong, Fanyi
    Nian, Sunqi
    Li, Zhigui
    Li, Na
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 94
  • [40] Effects of kinesiotape on pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Yuejie
    Yin, Ying
    Jia, Gongwei
    Chen, Hong
    Yu, Lehua
    Wu, Dandong
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 33 (04) : 596 - 606