Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program

被引:80
作者
Lee, Thomas J. W. [1 ]
Rees, Colin J. [3 ,4 ]
Blanks, Roger G. [5 ]
Moss, Sue M. [6 ]
Nickerson, Claire [7 ]
Wright, Karen C. [6 ]
James, Peter W. [2 ]
McNally, Richard J. Q. [2 ]
Patnick, Julietta [7 ]
Rutter, Matthew D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp North Tees, Tees Bowel Canc Screening Ctr, Stockton On Tees, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] South Tyneside Dist Hosp, South Tyne Bowel Canc Screening Ctr, South Shields, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Durham, Sch Med Pharm & Hlth, Stockton On Tees, England
[5] Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
[6] Univ London, Inst Canc Res, Canc Screening Evaluat Unit, London, England
[7] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
SERRATED POLYP DETECTION; N-BUTYL BROMIDE; BOWEL PREPARATION; DETECTION RATES; RISK-FACTORS; DOUBLE-BLIND; QUALITY; NEOPLASIA; YIELD; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1358831
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Adenoma detection is a key objective of colonoscopy, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer screening. The aim of this observational study was to identify the technical colonoscopy factors associated with adenoma detection. Patients and methods: The study analyzed data from the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. The indication for all colonoscopies was a positive fecal occult blood test. The relationships between the following colonoscopy factors and adenoma detection (one or more adenomas, advanced adenomas, right-sided adenomas, and total number of adenomas) were examined in multivariable analyses: bowel preparation quality, cecal intubation, withdrawal time, rectal retroversion, colonoscopist experience, antispasmodic use, sedation use, and start time of procedure. The following patient factors were controlled for: age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, deprivation, and geographical location. Results: A total of 31088 colonoscopies were analyzed. The following technical factors increased the relative risk of adenoma detection (P<0.001 in multivariable analysis unless otherwise stated): cecal intubation, increased withdrawal time, higher quality bowel preparation, intravenous antispasmodic use, earlier procedure start time within a session (P=0.018), and greater colonoscopist experience. Detection of advanced and right-sided adenomas also increased with these factors. Adenoma detection did not differ between sedated and unsedated colonoscopy (P=0.143). Conclusion: This study demonstrated important associations between colonoscopy practice and adenoma detection. Use of intravenous antispasmodic was associated with increased adenoma detection. The effect of the start time of colonoscopy suggests that endoscopist fatigue may have a deleterious impact on adenoma detection.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 211
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3)
    Adler, Andreas
    Wegscheider, Karl
    Lieberman, David
    Aminalai, Alireza
    Aschenbeck, Jens
    Drossel, Rolf
    Mayr, Michael
    Mross, Michael
    Scheel, Mathias
    Schroeder, Andreas
    Gerber, Katharina
    Stange, Gabriela
    Roll, Stephanie
    Gauger, Ulrich
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Rosch, Thomas
    [J]. GUT, 2013, 62 (02) : 236 - 241
  • [2] Prevalence and risk of colorectal neoplasia in consumers of alcohol in a screening population
    Anderson, JC
    Alpern, Z
    Sethi, G
    Messina, CR
    Martin, C
    Hubbard, PM
    Grimson, R
    Ells, PE
    Shaw, RD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (09) : 2049 - 2055
  • [3] Anderson JC, 2003, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V98, P2777, DOI [10.1016/S0002-9270(03)01704-0, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08671.x]
  • [4] Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
    Atkin, W
    Rogers, P
    Cardwell, C
    Cook, C
    Cuzick, J
    Wardle, J
    Edwards, R
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (05) : 1247 - 1256
  • [5] Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy
    Barclay, Robert L.
    Vicari, Joseph J.
    Doughty, Andrea S.
    Johanson, John F.
    Greenlaw, Roger L.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) : 2533 - 2541
  • [6] Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Belsey, J.
    Epstein, O.
    Heresbach, D.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 25 (04) : 373 - 384
  • [7] Fewer Polyps Detected by Colonoscopy as the Day Progresses at a Veteran's Administration Teaching Hospital
    Chan, Michael Y.
    Cohen, Hartley
    Spiegel, Brennan M. R.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (11) : 1217 - 1223
  • [8] Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy
    Chen, Shawn C.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (04) : 856 - 861
  • [9] Chilton A, BCSP QUALITY ASSURAN
  • [10] Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy
    Chokshi, Reena V.
    Hovis, Christine E.
    Hollander, Thomas
    Early, Dayna S.
    Wang, Jean S.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (06) : 1197 - 1203