Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Versus Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant: Can a Fair Comparison be Made?

被引:20
作者
Weiss, Andrew S. [1 ]
Smits, Gerard [2 ]
Wiseman, Alexander C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Transplant Ctr, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Renal Dis & Hypertens, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] CSC Inc, Biostat Consulting Serv, Santa Barbara, CA USA
关键词
Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; Deceased donor kidney alone transplantation; Transplant outcomes; DIABETIC-NEPHROPATHY; PATIENT SURVIVAL; COLD ISCHEMIA; UNITED-STATES; ALLOGRAFT; RECIPIENTS; REGIMENS; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a276fd
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) may provide superior patient and kidney graft survival compared with deceased donor kidney transplant alone (DD KA), not because of the addition of a pancreas transplant but because of differences in organ donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis from the scientific registry of transplant recipients database comparing patient and kidney graft survival of SPK and DID KA recipients from 1997 to 2005, segregating the DD KA recipients into (a) recipients of KA from pancreas donors (KA, P+) and (b) recipients of KA from non-pancreas donors to control for donor differences. Results. Of 8453 SPK waitlisted patients, 7952 received SPK, 101 received KA, P+, and 401 received KA from non-pancreas donors (KA, P-). Five-year kidney graft survival was not different in the SPK and KA, P+ groups (76.2% vs. 81.9%, P=0.15) and was significantly better than the KA, P- group (64.3%, SPK vs. KA, P-, P=0.002; KA, P+ vs. KA, P-, P=0.01). When controlling for recipient and transplant differences by multivariate analysis, KA, P+ transplant was associated with a 50% reduction in risk for kidney graft loss compared with SPK. Conclusions. Donor, recipient, and transplant differences exist when comparing SPK to DID KA that bias outcomes in favor of SPK and limit conclusions regarding superior graft and patient survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1402 / 1410
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Infectious complications following 72 consecutive enteric-drained pancreas transplants [J].
Berger, N. ;
Wirmsberger, R. ;
Kafka, R. ;
Margreiter, C. ;
Ebenbichler, C. ;
Stelzmueller, I. ;
Margreiter, R. ;
Steurer, W. ;
Mark, W. ;
Bonatti, H. .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (07) :549-557
[2]   Kidney allograft and patient survival in type I diabetic recipients of cadaveric kidney alone versus simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants:: A multivariate analysis of the UNOS database [J].
Bunnapradist, S ;
Cho, YW ;
Cecka, JM ;
Wilkinson, A ;
Danovitch, GM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) :208-213
[3]   Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1995-2004 [J].
Cohen, DJ ;
St Martin, L ;
Christensen, LL ;
Bloom, RD ;
Sung, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) :1153-1169
[4]   Reversal of lesions of diabetic nephropathy after pancreas transplantation [J].
Fioretto, P ;
Steffes, MW ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Goetz, FC ;
Mauer, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (02) :69-75
[5]  
Gjertson D W, 1996, Clin Transpl, P343
[6]   Duration of end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant outcome [J].
Goldfarb-Rumyantzev, A ;
Hurdle, JF ;
Scandling, J ;
Wang, Z ;
Baird, B ;
Barenbaum, L ;
Cheung, AK .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (01) :167-175
[7]   Mortality assessment for pancreas transplants [J].
Gruessner, RWG ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Gruessner, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (12) :2018-2026
[8]   Impact of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant and timing of transplant on kidney allograft survival [J].
Israni, AK ;
Feldman, HI ;
Propert, KJ ;
Leonard, M ;
Mange, KC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (02) :374-382
[9]  
Koznarová R, 2000, CELL TRANSPLANT, V9, P903
[10]   Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors. [J].
Mange, KC ;
Joffe, MM ;
Feldman, HI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (10) :726-731