Effects of formative assessments to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students: Results from a randomized controlled intervention

被引:36
作者
Meusen-Beekman, Kelly D. [1 ,4 ]
Joosten-ten Brinke, Desiree [2 ,3 ]
Boshuizen, Henny P. A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] HZ Univ Appl Sci, Vlissingen, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] Fontys Univ Appl Sci, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Roosevelt Ctr Excellence Educ, Middelburg, Netherlands
[5] Univ Turku, SF-20500 Turku, Finland
关键词
Formative assessment; Primary education; Selfregulation; Motivation; Self-efficacy; EFFICACY; METAANALYSIS; STRATEGIES; MOTIVATION; BELIEFS; INQUIRY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article presents the results of a formative assessment intervention in writing assignments in sixth grade. We examined whether the formative assessments (i.e. peer and self-assessment) would improve self-regulation, motivation and self-efficacy among sixth graders, and whether differential effects exist between formative assessment forms. The study lasted for 27 weeks. Participants (N = 695) were exposed to one of three conditions: peer assessment intervention, self-assessment intervention, or a control condition. The interventions were delivered in a whole-classroom format. The results of a multilevel analysis showed that the use of formative assessment to develop self-regulation among students was effective for both intervention groups. Also, motivation was affected in both intervention groups. Finally, no significant differences were found between the peer assessment intervention, and the self-assessment intervention concerning self-regulation, motivation, or self-efficacy. The implications of these results are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 136
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Allal L., 2010, International encyclopedia of education, V3, P348, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00362-6
[2]   Effects of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning [J].
Alonso-Tapia, Jesus ;
Panadero, Ernesto .
INFANCIA Y APRENDIZAJE, 2010, 33 (03) :385-397
[3]  
Andrade H., 2014, S ANN M AM ED RES AS
[4]   Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion [J].
Azevedo, Roger .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2009, 4 (01) :87-95
[5]  
Bandura Albert, 1999, Self-efficacy, V13, P158, DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
[6]  
Bembenutty H., 2009, Psychology Journal, V6, P138
[7]  
Berry RAW, 2006, J LEARN DISABIL-US, V39, P11
[8]  
Birenbaum M., 1996, Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge, P3, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3
[9]   'In praise of educational research': formative assessment [J].
Black, P ;
Wiliam, D .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2003, 29 (05) :623-637
[10]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, V5, P7, DOI [10.1080/0969595980050102, DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102]