Relationship of Bicipital Groove Rotation with Humeral Head Retroversion A Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Analysis

被引:21
作者
Johnson, Jeff W. [1 ]
Thostenson, Jeff D. [1 ]
Suva, Larry J. [1 ]
Hasan, S. Ashfaq [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
PROXIMAL HUMERUS; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHETIC DESIGN; FRACTURES; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; GEOMETRY; MALPOSITION; ORIENTATION; LANDMARK;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.J.00085
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Bicipital groove location has been used as a reference for humeral stem orientation in total shoulder arthroplasty to recreate humeral head retroversion. However, anatomic variability has rendered its use for prosthetic orientation problematic in cases of comminuted proximal fractures. We hypothesized that variability in groove rotation is directly related to variability in humeral head retroversion and that by defining the degree of groove rotation, humeral head retroversion can be predicted. Methods: Computed tomographic scans (1-mm sections) were obtained along the entire lengths of thirty-four cadaveric humeri, and three-dimensional models were created by using computer-assisted design software. Humeral head retroversion was determined in reference to the transepicondylar axis. The bicipital groove was mapped from proximal to distal, and the rotation of the groove in relationship to the transepicondylar axis was tracked over the entire length of the groove. The overall groove rotation and the rotation of its proximal, intermediate, and distal 15-mm segments were determined. Results: The average humeral head retroversion was 21 degrees, and the average angles of groove rotation in relation to the transepicondylar axis for the overall groove and the proximal, intermediate, and distal segments were 65 degrees, 60 degrees, 63 degrees, and 71 degrees of internal rotation relative to the transepicondylar axis, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients between bicipital groove rotation and humeral head retroversion were >= 0.78 for all segments. Conclusions: A previously unknown direct correlation between bicipital groove rotation and humeral head retroversion was found to exist. The ability to predict humeral head retroversion when mapping only the distal third of the groove has potentially important clinical implications because the distal third is often the only portion of the groove remaining in patients with a comminuted proximal humeral fracture. This is particularly relevant with computer-navigated surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Bicipital groove orientation: Considerations for the retroversion of a prosthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus [J].
Balg, F ;
Boulianne, M ;
Boileau, P .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (02) :195-198
[2]  
Ballmer F T, 1993, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V2, P296, DOI 10.1016/1058-2746(93)90075-R
[3]   Tuberosity malposition and migration:: Reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus [J].
Boileau, P ;
Krishnan, SG ;
Tinsi, L ;
Walch, G ;
Coste, JS ;
Molé, D .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (05) :401-412
[4]   Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus [J].
Boileau, P ;
Trojani, C ;
Walch, G ;
Krishnan, SG ;
Romeo, A ;
Sinnerton, R .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (04) :299-308
[5]   The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus - Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design [J].
Boileau, P ;
Walch, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (05) :857-865
[6]   An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus [J].
DeLude, Jennifer A. ;
Bicknell, Ryan T. ;
MacKenzie, Geoff A. ;
Ferreira, Louis M. ;
Dunning, Cynthia E. ;
King, Graham J. W. ;
Johnson, James A. ;
Drosdowech, Darren S. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (04) :477-483
[7]   Comparison of humeral head retroversion with the humeral axis biceps groove relationship: A study in live subjects and cadavers [J].
Doyle, AJ ;
Burks, RT .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (05) :453-457
[8]   Variations in the retroversion of the humeral head [J].
Edelson, G .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1999, 8 (02) :142-145
[9]  
Fleute M, 1999, Med Image Anal, V3, P209, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(99)80020-6
[10]   Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus fractures [J].
Frankle, MA ;
Greenwald, DP ;
Markee, BA ;
Ondrovic, LE ;
Lee, WE .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (04) :321-326