Interpretable AI Explores Effective Components of CAD/CAM Resin Composites

被引:15
作者
Li, H. [1 ]
Sakai, T. [1 ,2 ]
Tanaka, A. [1 ]
Ogura, M. [1 ]
Lee, C. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, S. [1 ]
Imazato, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Biomat Sci, Grad Sch Dent, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Grad Sch Dent, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
artificial intelligence; CAD-CAM; composite materials; deep learning; machine learning; prosthetic dentistry; prosthodontics; restorative dentistry; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BLOCKS; WEAR; PREDICTION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1177/00220345221089251
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
High flexural strength of computer-aided manufacturing resin composite blocks (CAD/CAM RCBs) are required in clinical scenarios. However, the conventional in vitro approach of modifying materials' composition by trial and error was not efficient to explore the effective components that contribute to the flexural strength. Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool to achieve the above goals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop ML models to predict the flexural strength of CAD/CAM RCBs and explore the components that affect flexural strength as the first step. The composition of 12 commercially available products and flexural strength were collected from the manufacturers and literature. The initial data consisted of 16 attributes and 12 samples. Considering that the input data for each sample were recognized as a multidimensional vector, a fluctuation range of 0.1 was proposed for each vector and the number of samples was augmented to 120. Regression algorithms-that is, random forest (RF), extra trees, gradient boosting decision tree, light gradient boosting machine, and extreme gradient boosting-were used to develop 5 ML models to predict flexural strength. An exhaustive search and feature importance analysis were conducted to analyze the effective components that affected flexural strength. The R-2 values for each model were 0.947, 0.997, 0.998, 0.983, and 0.927, respectively. The relative errors of all the algorithms were within 15%. Among the high predicted flexural strength group in the exhaustive search, urethane dimethacrylate was contained in all compositions. Filler content and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate were the top 2 features predicted by all models in the feature importance analysis. ZrSiO4 was the third important feature for all models, except the RF model. The ML models established in this study successfully predicted the flexural strength of CAD/CAM RCBs and identified the effective components that affected flexural strength based on the available data set.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1371
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Bonding performance of dispersed filler resin composite CAD/CAM blocks with different surface treatment protocols
    Abdou, Ahmed
    Takagaki, Tomohiro
    Alghamdi, Ali
    Tichy, Antonin
    Nikaido, Toru
    Tagami, Junji
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (01) : 209 - 219
  • [2] Effect of the Composition of CAD/CAM Composite Blocks on Mechanical Properties
    Alamoush, Rasha A.
    Silikas, Nick
    Salim, Nesreen A.
    Al-Nasrawi, Suhad
    Satterthwaite, Julian D.
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites
    Asmussen, E
    Peutzfeldt, A
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [4] Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
    Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro
    Diaz-Rodriguez, Natalia
    Del Ser, Javier
    Bennetot, Adrien
    Tabik, Siham
    Barbado, Alberto
    Garcia, Salvador
    Gil-Lopez, Sergio
    Molina, Daniel
    Benjamins, Richard
    Chatila, Raja
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 58 : 82 - 115
  • [5] Predicting Young's modulus of oxide glasses with sparse datasets using machine learning
    Bishnoi, Suresh
    Singh, Sourabh
    Ravinder, R.
    Bauchy, Mathieu
    Gosvami, Nitya Nand
    Kodamana, Hariprasad
    Krishnan, N. M. Anoop
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, 2019, 524
  • [6] Machine learning for molecular and materials science
    Butler, Keith T.
    Davies, Daniel W.
    Cartwright, Hugh
    Isayev, Olexandr
    Walsh, Aron
    [J]. NATURE, 2018, 559 (7715) : 547 - 555
  • [7] Machine learning for composite materials
    Chen, Chun-Teh
    Gu, Grace X.
    [J]. MRS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 9 (02) : 556 - 566
  • [8] An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization
    Dietterich, TG
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2000, 40 (02) : 139 - 157
  • [9] Aging behavior of high-translucent CAD/CAM resin-based composite blocks
    Ducke, Vivian Marie
    Ilie, Nicoleta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2021, 115
  • [10] XAI-Explainable artificial intelligence
    Gunning, David
    Stefik, Mark
    Choi, Jaesik
    Miller, Timothy
    Stumpf, Simone
    Yang, Guang-Zhong
    [J]. SCIENCE ROBOTICS, 2019, 4 (37)