Nature of the binding interaction for 50 structurally diverse chemicals with rat estrogen receptors

被引:37
作者
Laws, Susan C.
Yavanhxay, S.
Cooper, Ralph L.
Eldridge, J. Charles
机构
[1] US EPA, Endocrinol Branch, Reprod Toxicol Div,Off Res & Dev, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Physiol Pharmacol Dept, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
estrogen receptors; rat uterine cytosol; environmental chemicals; Ki;
D O I
10.1093/toxsci/kfl092
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to characterize the estrogen receptor (ER)-binding affinities of 50 chemicals selected from among the high production volume chemicals under the U.S. EPA's (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's) Toxic Substances Control Act inventory. The chemicals were evaluated using the rat uterine cytosolic (RUC) ER-competitive binding assay, with secondary analysis using Lineweaver-Burk plots and slope replots to confirm true competitive inhibition and to determine an experimental K-i. Data from these ER-competitive binding assays represent the types of competitive binding curves that can be obtained when screening chemicals with broad structural diversity. True competitive inhibition was observed in 17 of 50 chemicals. Binding affinities were much lower than that of estradiol (E-2) with K-i concentrations ranging from 0.6 to 373 mu M as compared with that of E-2 (0.77nM). Other chemicals that appeared to displace radiolabeled E-2 binding to ER were, in fact, found not to be competitive inhibitors in the secondary K-i experiments. These seven chemicals likely altered the stability of the assay by changing the buffer pH, denaturing ER, or disrupting the ER-binding kinetics. Thus, several conditions that may confound interpretation of RUC ER-binding assay data are illustrated. For another group of eight chemicals, neither an IC50 nor K-i could be determined due to solubility constraints. These chemicals exhibited slight (20-40%) inhibition at concentrations of 10-100 mu M, suggesting that they could be competitors at very high concentrations, yet K-i experiments were not possible as the limit of chemical solubility in the aqueous assay buffer was well above the IC50. An additional 18 of the 50 chemicals were classified as nonbinders because in concentrations up to 100 mu M they produced essentially no displacement of radiolabeled E-2. These results show that although the ER-competitive binding assay is a valuable tool for screening chemicals, secondary tests such as a double reciprocal Lineweaver-Burk experiment with slope replot should be used to confirm true competitive inhibition. This information will be useful for the ongoing validation of the RUC ER-competitive binding assay under the U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, as well as to support research efforts to develop computational models designed to identify chemicals with the ability to bind to ER.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 56
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Uterotrophic activity of bisphenol A in the immature rat [J].
Ashby, J ;
Tinwell, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 (11) :719-720
[2]   ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY OF AN ENVIRONMENTALLY PERSISTENT ALKYLPHENOL IN THE REPRODUCTIVE-TRACT BUT NOT THE BRAIN OF RODENTS [J].
BICKNELL, RJ ;
HERBISON, AE ;
SUMPTER, JP .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 54 (1-2) :7-9
[3]  
Bigsby RM, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P865
[4]   Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor [J].
Brzozowski, AM ;
Pike, ACW ;
Dauter, Z ;
Hubbard, RE ;
Bonn, T ;
Engstrom, O ;
Ohman, L ;
Greene, GL ;
Gustafsson, JA ;
Carlquist, M .
NATURE, 1997, 389 (6652) :753-758
[5]   STUDIES ON INVIVO AND INVITRO ESTROGENIC ACTIVITIES OF METHOXYCHLOR AND ITS METABOLITES ROLE OF HEPATIC MONO-OXYGENASE IN METHOXYCHLOR ACTIVATION [J].
BULGER, WH ;
MUCCITELLI, RM ;
KUPFER, D .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1978, 27 (20) :2417-2423
[6]   INTERACTIONS OF METHOXYCHLOR, METHOXYCHLOR BASE-SOLUBLE CONTAMINANT, AND 2,2-BIS(PARA-HYDROXYPHENYL)-1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE WITH RAT UTERINE ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR [J].
BULGER, WH ;
MUCCITELLI, RM ;
KUPFER, D .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1978, 4 (5-6) :881-893
[7]  
CHENG Y, 1973, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL, V22, P3099
[8]   ESTROGEN RECEPTORS . AN EVALUATION OF CYTOPLASMIC-NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS IN A CELL-FREE SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR ASSAY [J].
CLARK, JH ;
GORSKI, J .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1969, 192 (03) :508-&
[9]  
Danzo BJ, 1997, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V105, P294, DOI 10.2307/3433266
[10]   Obstacles to the prediction of estrogenicity from chemical structure: Assay-mediated metabolic transformation and the apparent promiscuous nature of the estrogen receptor [J].
Elsby, R ;
Ashby, J ;
Sumpter, JP ;
Brooks, AN ;
Pennie, WD ;
Maggs, JL ;
Lefevre, PA ;
Odum, J ;
Beresford, N ;
Paton, D ;
Park, BK .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 60 (10) :1519-1530